JINQIAN, a meme token launched on Robinhood Chain, surged to an $80 million market value within its first hour of trading on Sept. 2 before collapsing to $10 million in the following hour and roughly $3 million by publication. The reversal came after Rune, an overseas crypto influencer who promoted a supposed stock-acquisition and short-squeeze strategy behind the token, said the narrative in his earlier post had been fabricated with Claude.
The episode linked speculative meme-token trading to Farmmi Inc., the Nasdaq-listed mushroom seller trading under FAMI. Rune’s Sept. 1 post claimed that he had spent $1.8 million in an over-the-counter transaction to acquire 37.4% of a company valued at $4.8 million. He listed a $0.12 share price and short interest of 92.3%, then described a plan involving a tokenized stock, a paired meme token, and eventual purchases of the underlying U.S.-listed shares.
One day later, JINQIAN appeared alongside an on-chain asset labeled FAMI. The structure implied that trading activity in JINQIAN could create demand for the FAMI token and, through arbitrage, lead to purchases of actual Farmmi shares. But the FAMI asset was not listed in Robinhood’s published contract list for tokenized stocks, according to the account of the event, and was not presented as an official tokenized version of Farmmi equity.
That missing link undermined the mechanism promoted in Rune’s original post. Without an authorized issuer able to redeem the on-chain token for the underlying security, or a confirmed obligation to acquire shares in response to token demand, buying pressure in JINQIAN had no established route into the U.S. stock market.
Farmmi shares jump alongside on-chain speculation
Farmmi shares nevertheless rose sharply during U.S. trading hours. The stock reportedly reached $0.47, more than triple its earlier level within about an hour, while the on-chain FAMI-labeled token also appreciated.
The move showed how a thinly traded micro-cap equity can be pulled into an on-chain trading narrative even where the claimed token-stock connection is unverified. Farmmi operates a mushroom business and, according to public company information referenced in the supplied account, has 15 employees. The account also said its shares recorded trading volume of about 720 million shares during the volatile session.
In a company with a relatively small market value, a sudden influx of speculative orders can move the quoted share price sharply without proving that a token structure is working as advertised. Traders may have bought Farmmi directly after seeing the token promotion, betting that other market participants would follow rather than relying on any token redemption process.
The supplied account said the main JINQIAN liquidity pool processed 92,926 trades from 9,255 unique buying wallets over five hours. Such activity can create a powerful appearance of demand in a permissionless market, particularly when wallet counts and transaction totals spread rapidly through social media. Those figures do not, by themselves, establish that an on-chain asset represents shares or is backed by an issuer’s purchases in the equity market.
Rune retracts the acquisition narrative
Rune’s clarification followed online discussion that some affected traders were preparing to contact the FBI. He said the acquisition and short-squeeze story had been generated using Claude and was fabricated.
The retraction transformed the trade from a high-risk tokenized-equity experiment into a case of a meme token promoted with a false corporate-control narrative. JINQIAN’s market value had already fallen dramatically by then, dropping about 96% from its first-hour peak to approximately $3 million.
The sequence also exposes a recurring weakness in “paired stock” token promotions. A meme token can be linked by branding or pool design to an asset carrying the ticker of a public company, while the actual legal, custodial, and redemption arrangements remain absent or unclear. Traders may see an apparent price relationship and assume that arbitrageurs can close the gap by purchasing shares and minting stock tokens.
That process only works when the token issuer is authorized, the underlying asset can be acquired and custodied, and eligible participants can create or redeem tokens against the real security. The supplied account said Robinhood Chain has a single issuer for stock tokens and limits direct subscriptions and redemptions to authorized participants. It also noted that any movement of subscription funds into U.S. equities would be constrained by market hours, compliance checks, settlement, and custody arrangements.
Those operational limits matter when a 24-hour digital market is tied, formally or informally, to a stock that trades only during U.S. market sessions. A token can continue accumulating speculative demand overnight or through a weekend while the underlying equity market is closed. When the stock market reopens, the price implied by the token may have little connection to the available supply or the practical ability to hedge the exposure.
Similar formats draw speculative demand
Another token using a comparable format, BONER, was reported in the supplied account to have reached a $44 million market value. It was presented as paired with an on-chain asset labeled HIMS, a reference to Hims & Hers Health, the company known for telehealth services including erectile dysfunction treatments.
A Chinese-language crypto influencer known as Wang Xia’er was cited as showing an unrealized gain of more than $800,000 in BONER after entering at a reported cost basis of $226. The contrast with JINQIAN is stark: one trade was presented as a large paper gain, while the other became a rapid boom-and-bust event within roughly two hours.
The design creates incentives for early participants to promote a connection between the meme token, the on-chain ticker asset, and the listed company. Yet a rising token price does not demonstrate that the paired asset is regulated, collateralized, redeemable, or connected to purchases of the underlying shares.
The supplied analysis described the standard arbitrage route: rising demand for a meme token can lift a paired stock token, prompting market makers to buy the underlying shares and mint more tokens until prices converge. In the JINQIAN/FAMI case, the account said the FAMI token was issued by a non-compliant project, its issuer retained minting control, and the liquidity pool may not have been locked.
Those conditions would leave buyers exposed to risks beyond ordinary meme-token volatility. An issuer with minting authority can increase supply, while an unlocked pool can allow liquidity to be withdrawn. If the associated public stock is thinly traded, even modest concentrated selling can also reverse the equity move that helped fuel the original narrative.
The JINQIAN collapse leaves a straightforward lesson for traders considering stock-linked token promotions: a ticker symbol, a liquidity pool, and a viral theory about arbitrage do not create a verified claim on a listed company’s shares.
Before chasing the next JINQIAN-style spike, learn the risks of tokenized equities in this detailed guide.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
