Real-world-asset perpetuals have become one of the largest sources of activity on Hyperliquid, with markets linked to equities taking ground previously dominated by major cryptocurrency contracts. The shift has been driven by HIP-3, a permissionless framework that allows third-party builders to create perpetual futures markets on the platform.
HIP-3 markets accounted for nearly 50% of Hyperliquid’s perpetual trading volume earlier this summer, compared with about 2% at the start of the year. TradeXYZ’s equity-focused markets led the expansion, offering perpetual contracts tied to the Nasdaq-100 and individual publicly traded companies.
The growth places tokenized exposure to stocks and indexes closer to the center of crypto-native derivatives trading. Rather than waiting for conventional market hours or using a traditional brokerage account, traders can take leveraged long or short positions on price movements through perpetual contracts, which have no fixed expiry date.
These products do not necessarily give holders ownership of the underlying shares. They instead provide derivatives exposure to a reference price, leaving the reliability of the market dependent on its pricing mechanism, liquidity, collateral rules, and the structure set by each market deployer.
Equity contracts lead the RWA perpetuals market
Real-world-asset perpetual volumes across trading venues reached about $470 billion in June, up from roughly $85 billion in January, according to the figures provided. Binance, Hyperliquid and OKX together handled more than 80% of that activity.
The category includes contracts linked to equities, equity indexes, commodities and other off-chain assets. Equities have emerged as the dominant segment, with large technology stocks accounting for 62.3% of trading in the final weeks of summer, according to the supplied market data. Stocks also overtook commodities in overall share of RWA perpetual activity.
Total trading volume in the contracts described reached $3.16 trillion by the end of August. That figure represents cumulative activity rather than the value of shares or other assets held on-chain, but it illustrates how rapidly derivatives tied to traditional markets have become a high-turnover sector in crypto venues.
The acceleration has coincided with a rise in tokenized financial assets more broadly. The total on-chain value of tokenized real-world assets exceeded $35 billion in September, based on the figures in the supplied material. That pool includes forms of tokenized cash, government debt, funds and other financial claims, alongside newer equity-related products.
Trading volume and on-chain asset value measure different things. Perpetuals can generate large turnover because traders may open and close leveraged positions frequently, while tokenized funds or bonds are generally held as assets. Together, the data show that blockchain-based markets are increasingly being used both for holding financial instruments and for speculating on their price movements.
HIP-3 changes Hyperliquid’s market structure
Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 model has changed the platform’s role from a venue focused mainly on crypto perpetuals into infrastructure that can host specialized derivatives markets created by outside teams.
Permissionless deployment reduces the time and coordination needed to introduce a new market. A builder can design a contract around a specific index, stock or asset category rather than waiting for a central exchange operator to decide which products to list. That structure can expand market choice quickly, though it also places greater weight on the quality of price feeds, liquidation systems and market-making arrangements behind each contract.
TradeXYZ’s lead in Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 segment suggests that demand has concentrated around familiar equity benchmarks and large-cap shares rather than niche physical assets. A Nasdaq-100 contract offers exposure to a widely followed technology-heavy index, while single-stock perpetuals can attract traders seeking around-the-clock price exposure to companies that normally trade only during set exchange hours.
Weekend and overnight trading are especially relevant for products tied to public equities. Conventional stock markets close for much of the week, but crypto-native trading infrastructure remains open continuously. Derivatives prices can therefore move outside official equity-market sessions as participants react to earnings expectations, macroeconomic events, geopolitical developments or news involving individual companies.
That continuous trading does not guarantee that prices will match the next official market open. Liquidity can be thinner outside regular hours, and price gaps may emerge when underlying stock exchanges reopen. The design creates a new venue for price discovery, while also introducing risks that traders familiar with conventional equity markets may not encounter as often.
Tokenization may require more than one chain
Haseeb Qureshi, managing partner at Dragonfly Capital, has argued that the expansion of tokenized stocks, bonds and other real-world financial products will not lead to one blockchain absorbing all institutional activity.
Qureshi said major financial institutions such as Goldman Sachs and BlackRock would require blockchain environments with defined compliance controls and operational standards. Those requirements could include restrictions on who can hold or transfer an asset, systems for identity verification, privacy features, audit processes and governance arrangements tailored to regulated financial products.
His view challenges the assumption that tokenization will produce a winner-take-all market around a single general-purpose blockchain. Qureshi said Ethereum, Solana and Avalanche are unlikely to capture every category of financial activity, particularly where institutions need specialized controls or prefer separate infrastructure for different products and jurisdictions.
He compared blockchain ecosystems to cities: each can develop its own local network effects, participants and services while remaining connected to a wider economic system. In that model, tokenized finance would operate across multiple chains and application-specific networks rather than through one universal settlement layer.
The rise of RWA perpetuals gives that argument a practical market example. Hyperliquid’s permissionless framework has enabled equity-linked trading to grow rapidly within one derivatives ecosystem, while the assets and institutions behind tokenized securities may use different networks, custodians and compliance systems. The emerging market is therefore less likely to resemble a single digital stock exchange than a set of connected venues serving distinct trading, settlement and regulatory needs.
Explore how tokenized Wall Street is reshaping crypto—discover tokenized equities and their growing role in on-chain markets today.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
