A false claim that Donald Trump was preparing to launch a token on a blockchain linked to Robinhood briefly drove the TRUMP token above $3.40 on Aug. 22, nearly doubling its price in 24 hours before Eric Trump publicly rejected the story as a scam. The reversal exposed how quickly loosely sourced posts, wallet speculation and anonymous Telegram messages can move a politically branded memecoin with limited verified information behind it.
The rally began after messages circulated on Aug. 21 claiming to reveal an “inside” launch timetable for a Trump-related token at 2 a.m. the following day. A subsequent Telegram screenshot altered the narrative, suggesting the token would be associated with Eric Trump rather than Donald Trump and would arrive later. Neither claim came with an official announcement from the Trump family, Trump Media, Robinhood or a disclosed development team.
TRUMP’s price jumped from an Aug. 20 intraday high of about $1.865 to more than $3.40 two days later, its highest level since March 21, according to market price data. Robinhood shares also rose more than 11% at one point as the rumor spread, although the company did not announce a Trump-linked blockchain project or token launch.
Eric Trump addressed the claims on Aug. 23, saying no token issuance was planned and warning that suggestions otherwise were fraudulent. The statement brought the immediate rally to a halt, with TRUMP later trading near $2.40 in late August.
On-chain claims added fuel to the rumor
The speculation gained a second wave of attention when community accounts began highlighting Ethereum wallet activity on Aug. 22. One newly created wallet received 290 ETH, prompting posts that a test token using the ticker “WWW” had been deployed.
Accounts promoting the token claimed it initially carried a 10% transaction tax, later reduced to 0.3%, and had reached a market value of roughly $10 million. They also said about 99.9% of the supply was controlled by a developer wallet identified as “Truth Coin.”
A separate set of posts referred to a token called “Test Coin,” reportedly created with a supply of 1 billion units. Neither asset was formally connected to Trump, Eric Trump, Trump Media or Robinhood. Crypto community members who traced related wallet activity later described addresses linked to the “WWW” and test-token contracts as having a history associated with suspected rug pulls, a term used for projects in which creators withdraw liquidity or sell concentrated token holdings after attracting buyers.
The episode showed how easily a token contract can be mistaken for evidence of an official launch. Creating a token on a public blockchain generally requires little more than deploying a smart contract, and a transaction from a fresh wallet does not establish that the wallet belongs to a public figure, company or project.
The proposed transaction-tax changes also offered a warning sign for traders. Such taxes can be built into a token’s contract and charged whenever users buy or sell. A high tax can make it expensive to exit a position, while developer-controlled supply can give a small group substantial influence over price and liquidity.
Team-linked wallets sold into the volatility
The rumor period also coincided with sizable transfers from wallets identified by blockchain observers as connected to the TRUMP token team.
On Aug. 23, a Solana address labeled “2RH...FSK” transferred 3.837 million SOL, valued at about $9.33 million at the time, through BitGo before the funds were sent to OKX, according to public blockchain records. The transfer occurred a day after TRUMP reached its short-lived peak above $3.40.
A second address, “BDNB...mx66,” added one-sided liquidity on Aug. 24 and received 2.94 million USDC after selling 1.10 million TRUMP tokens. The disclosed average sale price was $2.68 per token. One-sided liquidity refers to depositing only one asset into a liquidity pool, allowing the provider to sell that asset as buyers trade against the pool.
Together, the reported movements exceeded $12 million in value. Public wallet labels can indicate links suggested by blockchain analysts or community researchers, but the transfers themselves do not establish the motives behind the sales. They do show that substantial supply reached the market during a period when retail speculation was at its most intense.
That timing places additional focus on token concentration and wallet monitoring. Traders in thinly supported memecoin markets often face sharp price changes when large holders add liquidity, move assets to trading venues or sell holdings directly into market demand.
A separate Trump Media token plan remains distinct
Confusion around the rumor was partly reinforced by an unrelated Trump Media token program previously described for DJT shareholders. Under that plan, the record date was set for Feb. 2, 2026, with eligible holders receiving one token for each whole DJT share.
Trump Media stated that the proposed token would not represent equity, would not be a tokenized DJT share, would be non-transferable and could not be redeemed for cash. Those terms place the program far from the freely traded crypto asset described in the August rumor.
The distinction did little to prevent online posts from blending separate Trump-related branding, speculative token contracts and Robinhood references into a single narrative. By the time Eric Trump issued his denial, TRUMP had already experienced one of its largest short-term moves since March.
The episode leaves a straightforward record: an unverified launch claim lifted a politically branded token and coincided with millions of dollars in sales from team-linked wallets, while the supposed new token project was publicly denied within days. In markets where an anonymous screenshot can trigger a near-100% move, official statements and transparent on-chain ownership data carry far more weight than viral launch timetables.
Before chasing the next political memecoin pump, learn to spot crypto scams and protect your capital.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
