South Korea’s tokenized-asset market remains small beside the country’s active cryptocurrency trading economy, even as regulators prepare rules that will confine domestic tokenized securities to private, licensed networks from February 2027.
The Bank of Korea said roughly 640 billion won, or about $450 million, in real-world assets had been tokenized domestically. That figure is less than one-eighth of the 5.4 trillion won average daily value traded on centralized cryptocurrency platforms during the second half of 2025, according to a March 2026 regulators’ survey.
The contrast places South Korea’s next tokenization phase less in the realm of retail crypto speculation and more in financial-market infrastructure. Local asset managers, banks and securities firms are testing tokenized funds, payment systems and cross-border settlement tools, while the Financial Services Commission builds the legal framework for security tokens and lawmakers debate rules for won-denominated stablecoins.
Domestic tokenization remains concentrated in royalties and art
The Bank of Korea’s figures show that domestic issuance has focused largely on assets that are difficult to standardize through conventional securities markets. Music royalty income rights accounted for 65% of tokenized real-world assets, while art represented 17%.
Bonds, money-market funds and other standardized financial products have taken a much smaller share. That differs from the global market, where tokenization has increasingly centered on cash-equivalent instruments, government debt and funds whose underlying assets already have established valuation, custody and redemption processes.
RWA.xyz put the global tokenized-asset market at about $37.3 billion in August 2026, with more than 1.5 million users. Its mid-September data placed the total closer to $38.8 billion, reflecting continued issuance across tokenized Treasuries, private credit, commodities, funds and equities.
For Korean institutions, the gap suggests that the challenge is shifting from creating one-off digital representations of alternative assets toward building systems that can handle subscriptions, redemptions, custody, settlement and distribution for regulated financial products.
Shinhan Asset Management has tested that model through a proof of concept involving the on-chain issuance and distribution of won-denominated funds with overseas partners. Mirae Asset’s Hong Kong unit also launched a tokenized share class linked to a Global X exchange-traded fund in August 2026, illustrating how offshore entities are becoming a route for Korean financial groups to reach non-resident clients.
Private ledgers will define the local security-token market
South Korea’s planned structure for tokenized securities is deliberately narrow. Guidance issued by the Korea Securities Depository in September 2026 limits participants in security-token ledgers to the depository and account-management institutions. It also prohibits cryptocurrency assets from being used to pay transaction fees.
From February 2027, tokenized securities are expected to operate on private ledgers managed by licensed intermediaries. The model gives established financial institutions a central role in issuance and recordkeeping, while reducing the use of open public blockchain networks for domestically distributed securities.
That approach could help institutions meet compliance, identity-verification and securities-record requirements. It may also make interoperability more difficult if each platform develops separately and cannot efficiently connect to brokers, custodians, fund administrators and overseas settlement networks.
The Financial Services Commission has outlined a separate path for offshore issuance. In August 2026, the regulator said the Electronic Securities Act would not apply where an offshore entity tokenizes an offshore fund holding Korean underlying assets, privately sells the product to non-Korean residents and restricts resale to Korean residents.
The distinction gives Korean firms two different operating models: a regulated private-ledger system for the domestic market and offshore structures for international distribution. The latter could be particularly relevant for fund products aimed at foreign institutions seeking exposure to Korean assets.
Foreign settlement changes could increase demand for tokenized funds
Two planned changes could strengthen the case for offshore won-denominated products. The Bank of Korea intends to open won settlement to foreign banks in January 2027, while South Korea’s expected inclusion in the FTSE World Government Bond Index is projected to draw between 70 trillion won and 90 trillion won in passive foreign inflows.
More accessible won settlement would reduce a longstanding operational barrier for overseas financial institutions dealing in Korean securities. Index inclusion would bring a separate source of recurring demand from global bond funds that track the benchmark.
Tokenized fund structures would not replace existing securities settlement systems in the near term, but they could offer foreign distributors and institutional clients a faster way to subscribe to, redeem and monitor fund holdings if the legal and custody arrangements are accepted across jurisdictions.
Live examples already exist abroad. UBS has operated its tokenized money-market fund, uMINT, while J.P. Morgan has used its Tokenized Collateral Network and related fund infrastructure to process transactions in production environments. These projects are increasingly focused on operational workflows rather than simply issuing a digital token representing a fund share.
Stablecoin debate centers on cross-border settlement
A won stablecoin could become a separate but connected part of the infrastructure discussion. South Korea’s high trade exposure makes cross-border corporate payments a more immediate potential use case than retail payments. OECD data place the country’s trade-to-GDP ratio at about 85%, compared with roughly 25% for the United States.
The Bank of Korea has also advanced Project Hangang, its wholesale central bank digital currency initiative. During Phase 1, the central bank issued wholesale CBDC to participating banks, which converted customer deposits into deposit tokens for circulation. The project has expanded to nine banks and entered Phase 2, involving tests with real transactions.
Domestic payment pilots have taken a more cautious route. A card-industry proof of concept involving the Korea Credit Finance Association, major card companies and blockchain firm Lambda256 used a won stablecoin as the payment instrument while retaining existing card authorization and settlement systems.
That design reflects how tokenized payments may first reach consumers: the customer-facing experience can resemble ordinary card payments, while reconciliation, liquidity movement and settlement occur more quickly in the background.
The National Assembly is scheduled to review stablecoin legislation in November 2026, though the timetable for passage remains uncertain. The bill’s treatment of issuer reserves, redemption rights and licensing will determine whether won-linked tokens can move beyond limited pilots into trade settlement and institutional payment operations.
South Korea’s tokenization market is therefore developing along two tracks: tightly controlled domestic security-token networks and more internationally oriented fund and settlement experiments. The firms best positioned to benefit may be those able to connect the two without fragmenting liquidity, compliance records or custody across isolated systems.
Explore why Asia leads stablecoin adoption in cross-border payments in this stablecoin infrastructure deep-dive for regional context.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
