JPMorgan reported sharply larger long positions in BlackRock’s Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds during the second quarter, according to a Form 13F filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. The disclosure listed about 10.4 million shares of the iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT), up from 8.3 million shares in the first quarter, alongside a more than fourfold increase in shares of the iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA).
The filing provides another indication that crypto-linked ETFs have become part of the product mix held across major financial institutions, though it does not establish that JPMorgan itself made a directional bet on Bitcoin or Ether. The report aggregates positions across 17 investment managers within the firm and can include client-related holdings, market-making inventory and other managed accounts.
JPMorgan’s reported IBIT stake was valued at roughly $356 million in the filing. Its ETHA position rose to about 1.17 million shares as of June 30, compared with roughly 267,000 shares reported at the end of March.
Filing shows larger reported exposure to BlackRock crypto ETFs
The increase in the reported Bitcoin ETF position amounted to about 25% quarter over quarter. The Ether ETF holding expanded by more than 300%, making it the faster-growing of the two positions from a percentage standpoint.
IBIT and ETHA are BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin and Ether funds, designed to hold the underlying cryptocurrency while allowing shares to trade through conventional brokerage accounts. Their presence in a large bank’s 13F disclosure shows how crypto exposure can now sit alongside equities, bonds and other exchange-traded products in managed portfolios.
The June 30 reporting date is also important. Form 13F filings are historical snapshots, generally submitted weeks after the end of a quarter. They show positions held on a specific date rather than real-time purchases, sales or current exposure.
That delay limits the ability to draw conclusions about JPMorgan’s present holdings or trading activity. A position that appeared in the June filing may have changed materially by the time the document became public.
13F data does not show net market positioning
Jonatan Randin, senior market analyst at PrimeXBT, said Form 13F reports can combine holdings from different parts of an institution, including positions connected to clients and inventory held through trading operations.
The filings also report long US-listed securities but do not disclose short positions. As a result, a reported holding in an ETF does not reveal whether the institution had offsetting trades, derivatives positions or other arrangements that reduced its net exposure to Bitcoin or Ether.
That distinction is particularly relevant for banks and large asset managers, whose reported securities can reflect services provided to customers rather than a house view on the direction of crypto prices. A sizeable ETF line item can therefore indicate rising demand for an accessible regulated product without offering a complete picture of risk held across the organization.
JPMorgan’s filing does, nonetheless, place the firm among institutions reporting exposure to the expanding US market for spot cryptocurrency ETFs. The products have given wealth managers, funds and brokerages a familiar securities wrapper for Bitcoin and Ether exposure, avoiding the operational need to directly hold and custody tokens.
XRP products appear in the quarterly disclosure
The filing also included small positions tied to XRP investment products after none appeared in JPMorgan’s first-quarter report. It listed 181 shares of Grayscale’s XRP product, valued at $3,763, and 113 shares of Bitwise’s XRP ETF, valued at $1,356.
The amounts are small compared with the reported IBIT and ETHA holdings, so they do not point to XRP becoming a meaningful part of the firm’s disclosed crypto-fund exposure. Their appearance does show that the range of crypto-linked products in the reported portfolio widened during the quarter.
Randin linked the timing of the XRP-related entries to regulatory developments and the rollout of spot XRP investment products in the United States. Yet, as with the Bitcoin and Ether ETF positions, the 13F alone cannot identify the purpose of the holdings or whether they reflected customer activity, trading inventory or discretionary portfolio decisions.
Mining exposure moved in the opposite direction
The same disclosure indicated reduced exposure to several Bitcoin mining companies, according to Randin. That pullback comes as some mining businesses seek revenue beyond block rewards by building artificial intelligence and high-performance computing operations.
Mining stocks and spot Bitcoin ETFs offer very different forms of crypto-market exposure. ETF shares generally track the value of the underlying asset, subject to fees and trading conditions. Mining companies face additional variables, including electricity costs, hardware spending, network difficulty, debt, operational execution and the economics of data-center expansion.
Reducing mining-related positions while increasing ETF holdings would therefore fit a preference for more direct and standardized cryptocurrency exposure, though the filing does not provide JPMorgan’s reasoning.
The disclosure should be read as evidence of where reported securities positions stood at the end of the second quarter, rather than proof that a major bank committed proprietary capital to a one-way crypto trade. Its clearest signal is the growing role of spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs within the portfolios and trading infrastructure of large US financial institutions.
Explore how traditional finance meets crypto—see our guide on ETFs and how they work in today’s markets.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
