Hong Kong has moved from designing stablecoin rules to allowing regulated distribution, with the Securities and Futures Commission setting conditions for licensed platforms and brokerages to offer stablecoins issued by Hong Kong Monetary Authority-approved firms. The May 27, 2026 circular followed the HKMA’s issuance of its first two stablecoin issuer licences on April 10, creating a route from regulated issuance to client trading, custody and redemption.
The arrangement gives approved fiat-referenced stablecoins a distinct path into Hong Kong’s retail-facing virtual asset market. Licensed virtual asset trading platforms and licensed corporations can now support services involving “relevant stablecoins” — stablecoins issued by HKMA licensees within the scope of their licences — without meeting some of the index and liquidity tests normally imposed on tokens available to retail clients.
That exemption is narrow. Platforms must continue due diligence on each stablecoin, while the SFC requires disclosures covering the token’s stabilisation mechanism, reserve assets and redemption process. Firms also remain responsible for client suitability when they solicit or recommend a stablecoin.
Issuance, trading and securities now sit under separate laws
Hong Kong’s system divides oversight according to what a token does and which service a firm provides. Fiat-referenced stablecoin issuance falls under the Stablecoins Ordinance, or Cap. 656, which came into effect in August 2025. The HKMA supervises issuers, reserve arrangements and redemption obligations.
Trading platforms handling virtual assets that are not securities are regulated under Part 5B of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance, Cap. 615. The SFC licenses qualifying corporations to operate virtual asset trading platforms and supervises their conduct, custody and anti-money-laundering systems.
Tokens that carry characteristics of securities or collective investment schemes remain within the Securities and Futures Ordinance, Cap. 571. A platform offering those products would generally need the relevant SFC permissions, including Type 1 dealing in securities and Type 7 automated trading services where applicable.
The result is a functional model rather than a single cryptocurrency rulebook. A stablecoin issuer handles the promise that a token can be redeemed at par. A trading platform handles token admission, market operations and custody. A securities firm handles activities involving regulated investment products.
Retail stablecoin access receives tailored treatment
The SFC’s May circular modifies several existing requirements for relevant stablecoins. Under the platform operator guideline, tokens made available to retail clients generally must meet liquidity standards and be included in large virtual asset indices produced by at least two qualified independent index providers. At least one of those providers must have experience in traditional securities-market indices.
Relevant stablecoins are exempt from those index and liquidity thresholds. That change recognizes that a regulated stablecoin’s primary assessment is linked to its issuer’s reserves and redemption arrangements rather than to its market-trading profile.
The circular also relaxes certain onboarding requirements. A firm providing only relevant stablecoin services may bypass the general virtual asset knowledge assessment otherwise used for clients. Holdings of relevant stablecoins may also be excluded from a client’s virtual asset exposure limit.
Those changes do not remove core conduct duties. Where a platform or licensed corporation recommends a product or solicits a transaction, it must continue to assess suitability. The rules therefore make stablecoin access less procedurally burdensome while retaining responsibility for advice-led sales.
Licensed corporations may also cooperate directly with HKMA-licensed stablecoin issuers to provide trading services. The circular permits a licensed corporation to serve retail clients through an omnibus account on a professional-investor-only platform, provided that the corporation itself handles retail onboarding and suitability obligations.
Reserve and redemption rules underpin the issuer licence
Cap. 656 bars any person from carrying on, or holding itself out as carrying on, regulated stablecoin activity without an HKMA licence or an applicable exemption. The legislation places the financial promise behind a stablecoin at the centre of its licensing regime.
Under Schedule 2 of the ordinance, an issuer must maintain paid-up share capital of at least HK$25 million, unless the HKMA accepts equivalent financial resources. It must also maintain a separate reserve pool for each type of specified stablecoin.
The market value of that reserve pool must at all times equal at least the par value of stablecoins in circulation. Reserves must be segregated from the issuer’s other funds and from reserves supporting other stablecoins. The law requires reserve assets to be high quality, highly liquid and low risk, with independent attestation and audit.
Issuers must also redeem tokens at par value, subject to reasonable conditions and fees, and must pay the reference currency as soon as practicable after receiving a valid redemption request. HKMA guidance requires an effective redemption system and addresses holders’ rights to the reserve pool if an issuer becomes insolvent.
These requirements place Hong Kong’s regulated stablecoins closer to a supervised payment product than a conventional speculative token. The issuer’s reserve management, operational resilience, cybersecurity and governance are all continuing licensing issues rather than one-time application hurdles.
Platform custody remains tightly constrained
Distribution through a licensed platform does not reduce the platform’s existing obligations over client property. Under the SFC’s platform guidelines, client assets must be held on trust through an associated entity whose business is limited to receiving and holding those assets for the platform.
Client virtual assets must be segregated from proprietary holdings and maintained in dedicated wallets controlled by that associated entity. The rules generally require 98% of client virtual assets to be placed in cold storage, unless the SFC permits a different arrangement in a particular case.
The platform rules also address how private keys are generated, backed up and stored. Keys and backups must be securely kept in Hong Kong, and the controls must prevent any single individual from possessing complete key material. Withdrawal systems must include address whitelisting, authorization reviews and safeguards against tampering.
Those requirements matter for stablecoin distribution because a token can have regulated reserves while still exposing clients to operational risks at the trading or custody layer. Hong Kong’s framework assigns those risks to separate regulated entities rather than treating an issuer licence as a substitute for exchange controls.
A framework built for expansion
The regime arrives as Hong Kong develops related rules for tokenised securities, custody, brokerage-style virtual asset trading, advisory services and discretionary asset management. Consultation conclusions published in December 2025 covered virtual asset custody and certain trading services, while further 2026 policy work considered how additional activities could be brought into enforceable licensing structures under Cap. 615.
Tokenisation is already gaining a foothold in the city’s regulated markets. As of March 2026, tokenised retail fund products in Hong Kong had about HK$10.7 billion in assets under management, according to the SFC. The regulator also introduced a secondary-trading framework for tokenised authorised investment products, focusing on the connection between on-chain records, underlying legal rights, technology controls and disclosures.
The HKMA’s Ensemble work is examining another layer of the market: how tokenised deposits, tokenised assets and settlement money could interact through shared infrastructure. Its 2026 work includes EnsembleTX and tests involving tokenised central bank money for round-the-clock settlement.
With the first issuer licences now linked to distribution channels, Hong Kong has created a regulated route for stablecoins to move from reserve-backed issuance into client accounts. The framework’s durability will depend on how consistently issuers meet redemption promises and how effectively platforms apply the custody, disclosure and client-protection rules that sit around them.
For deeper context on Asia’s evolving rules, explore why stablecoins are becoming critical across Asian markets beyond Hong Kong’s new framework.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
