U.S. crypto policy is increasingly being shaped on two separate tracks: Congress remains deadlocked over the Clarity bill, while the Securities and Exchange Commission is advancing a narrower administrative package that could set near-term boundaries for token launches and fundraising. An Aug. 15 weekly roundup described the split as the market’s most immediate regulatory constraint, leaving projects to navigate agency rules while broader legislation remains unresolved.
The Clarity bill has reportedly stalled over three issues: anti-money-laundering and enforcement provisions, rules governing yield on stablecoins, and government ethics requirements related to a president’s crypto holdings. The roundup said a post-midterm “lame duck” session in November may offer the narrowest remaining route for legislation this year.
SEC rule package could move before Congress
The SEC’s proposed “Regulation Crypto” framework would draw on public remarks by SEC Chair Paul Atkins in March, according to the roundup. It would include a startup exemption, a fundraising exemption and an investment-contract safe harbor.
Such a framework could give early-stage token projects more defined routes to operate without waiting for Congress to resolve disagreements over market structure. Its reach would remain limited to matters under SEC jurisdiction, and any final rules could face legal challenges from industry groups or market participants.
The distinction creates a practical divide for token issuers. A federal statute could establish wider rules covering market oversight and the treatment of different crypto assets, while an SEC package would focus more tightly on securities-law questions. Projects considering token generation events may therefore face a patchwork environment in which agency exemptions matter before lawmakers reach a durable compromise.
Liquidity thesis puts yen and repo markets in focus
The roundup also placed renewed attention on dollar-liquidity theories tied to Japan’s holdings of U.S. Treasuries. Arthur Hayes outlined a scenario in which Japan could use the Federal Reserve’s Foreign and International Monetary Authorities, or FIMA, repo facility to pledge Treasuries for dollars, then use those dollars to buy yen.
The FIMA facility allows foreign official institutions to obtain temporary dollar liquidity without immediately selling Treasury securities into the market. Hayes argued that wider use of such operations could support dollar liquidity while reducing the pressure for large open-market Treasury sales.
That view gained relevance as the roundup cited U.S. 30-year Treasury auction yields reaching their highest level since 2001. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also recently proposed expanding the Federal Reserve’s daily repo capacity beyond its standard $60 billion limit, according to the roundup. A larger facility could give overseas institutions a more direct source of short-term dollar funding during periods of market stress.
Hayes said Bitcoin, physical gold and Ethena’s ENA token could benefit under a more liquid dollar backdrop, and projected ENA could rise fivefold to tenfold over coming months. That forecast remains a market thesis rather than a confirmed policy outcome, particularly because FIMA usage, currency intervention decisions and Fed repo operations depend on institutional choices that are not controlled by crypto markets.
Bitcoin valuation signals meet a catalyst shortage
Bitcoin’s valuation picture appeared less stretched after an 18% decline from a reported $126,000 peak to roughly $103,530. The roundup said the market value-to-realized value, or MVRV, ratio had fallen to about 1.9, below its 365-day moving average.
MVRV compares Bitcoin’s market capitalization with the aggregate value at which coins were last moved on-chain. The report characterized the current reading as near the lower end of Bitcoin’s historical valuation range, while also saying long-term holders continued accumulating.
A separate analysis cited in the roundup said Bitcoin’s decentralization and broader network health had not weakened relative to earlier periods. Yet it did not identify a decisive near-term catalyst. That combination leaves Bitcoin trading in a zone where some long-term valuation measures look more favorable, but where macro policy, regulation and risk appetite could still determine the next major move.
AI financing shifts attention from expansion to revenue
Outside crypto, the scale of financing planned for artificial-intelligence infrastructure raised questions about whether spending can translate into measurable returns. Nvidia was reported to be working with Wall Street firms on a potential $500 billion financing platform for AI compute, while Intel was reportedly raising $15 billion.
The fundraising activity coincided with selling in AI-linked equities as traders reassessed companies through revenue and cash-flow expectations rather than expansion narratives, the roundup said. It cited a rapid rotation from optical-communications shares into memory-related names after concerns emerged that AI-chip valuations may have peaked.
Lumentum Holdings, trading under the ticker LITE, posted strong earnings, according to the roundup. Yet it also warned that several major optical-communications stocks had already gained 40% to 50% during August, leaving their next earnings reports capable of producing sharp reversals. Coherent’s upcoming results were singled out as a potential volatility event.
The same reassessment extends to AI-related tokens. Projects promising computing infrastructure face rising pressure to demonstrate usage, fees or other measurable economic activity as public-market traders become more selective about capital-intensive technology narratives.
Protocol changes bring governance and custody risks
Protocol governance disputes added a separate layer of uncertainty. The roundup said a Bitcoin soft-fork effort linked to BIP-100 had failed, while supporters of BIP-110 were preparing to pursue a proof-of-work change that would move away from SHA-256d. Such a move would require a hard fork, creating the possibility of competing chains if communities, miners and infrastructure providers fail to converge on one implementation.
On Ethereum, EIP-8363, called “Tapered Issuance Burn,” would progressively burn newly issued staking rewards as staked ETH approaches half of the supply. The proposal would ultimately reduce the issuance reward to zero under its described design. The debate reportedly pressured tokens associated with liquid-staking protocols, including LDO and ETHFI, although the proposal remains far from implementation.
Hyperliquid, meanwhile, was reported to have expanded HIP-1 with programmable batch adjustments at the balance layer of HyperCore. The feature could support on-chain corporate actions such as dividends, stock splits, reverse splits, rebasing events and airdrops. It places more complex asset-management functions closer to the chain’s core accounting system, though its practical use will depend on adoption by applications issuing or managing tokenized assets.
Exploits reinforce operational pressure
Security remained a more immediate concern than governance theory for affected users. The roundup reported that an attacker minted 3 trillion ONE tokens on Harmony. It also said Neutrl paused protocol functions and that Bybit had filed a U.S. court case against a North Korea-linked hacking group, with an estimate that roughly 90% of the stolen funds may already be unrecoverable.
Those cases arrived alongside a week in which legal uncertainty, liquidity expectations and protocol-level disputes were all competing for market attention. The clearest near-term development remains the regulatory split in Washington: agency action may create usable compliance channels sooner, while congressional legislation continues to wait for political agreement.
For deeper context on U.S. crypto regulation and Congress–SEC dynamics, explore this detailed breakdown of evolving policy risks.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
