Bitcoin was trading near $64,700 on Tuesday as VanEck’s “Bitcoin Capitulation Check” showed eight of its 12 market-stress indicators in capitulation territory, adding evidence that the market remains under pressure even as U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted their strongest daily inflow since early May.
VanEck said all 12 of the indicators had entered capitulation zones at some point during the past three months. The signals are designed to track conditions commonly associated with heavy selling, weak sentiment and declining market activity. Their clustering suggests Bitcoin’s current slump has reached a phase where sellers have become increasingly reluctant to remain exposed, though the firm cautioned that the readings have not reliably identified short-term price bottoms.
Bitcoin has traded in a narrow range of roughly $58,000 to $66,500 since the beginning of June. At current levels, BTC remains about 48% below its October 2025 peak near $126,300, leaving the market well short of the recovery levels that followed earlier major drawdowns.
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded nearly $300 million in net inflows on Monday, the largest single-day intake since May 5. The return of substantial fund inflows gives Bitcoin a source of spot-market demand during a period when several on-chain and trading indicators point to reduced activity.
Historical bear-market timing points to autumn window
VanEck compared the current decline with three previous Bitcoin bear-market phases, which averaged 12.7 months from a cycle peak to their maximum drawdown. Bitcoin is now in its 11th month after an early October high, placing September through November within the historical timing range for a possible transition out of the deepest part of the decline.
That comparison provides a calendar-based reference rather than a forecast. The firm’s own work found that periods in which eight to 12 capitulation measures flashed together were followed by below-average Bitcoin returns over both 90-day and 180-day periods. In other words, widespread signs of stress have historically been associated with depressed market conditions, but they have offered limited precision for anyone attempting to trade an immediate rebound.
The distinction matters after several months of range-bound trading. Bitcoin has repeatedly held above the high-$50,000 area but has also struggled to establish sustained momentum above the mid-$60,000s. A capitulation framework can identify a market in distress without showing whether the next move will be a sharp recovery, a prolonged consolidation or another test of support.
Long-term holder supply has declined
On-chain data also points to a shift in the behavior of longer-term Bitcoin holders. The amount of BTC held for more than one year fell by about 356,000 BTC over the past 30 days, reaching 11.84 million BTC. That reduced the long-term holder share of circulating supply to below 60% for the first time in months.
A fall in long-term holder supply generally means coins that had remained dormant are being transferred or sold. That can increase available supply in the market, particularly when newer holders or institutional vehicles are absorbing coins. The data does not identify every seller’s motive, and movement from a long-held wallet does not automatically mean an immediate sale, but the scale of the monthly decline indicates that a meaningful portion of older supply has become active.
The reported reduction has not been uniform across all holder groups. Bitcoin held for at least 10 years showed only a marginal decline of about 0.1%, suggesting the oldest cohort has largely remained inactive through the latest drawdown. Selling pressure appears more concentrated among holders whose coins had been held for shorter, though still substantial, periods.
Trading activity has cooled sharply
Market participation has weakened alongside the price decline. Bitcoin’s realized volatility fell to 27.2% over the past month, according to Matthew Sigel, head of digital assets research at VanEck. That is markedly below Bitcoin’s long-run historical volatility profile, which has often been closer to 80%.
Lower volatility can reflect a market that has exhausted a wave of forced or reactive selling and entered a period of indecision. It can also make price moves appear calmer than the underlying market structure may warrant, particularly if liquidity and trading participation are declining at the same time.
Spot trading volume over the past 30 days dropped 27% from the preceding month and moved into the lowest 10th percentile of its historical range, according to the figures cited in the market update. Thin activity can make the market less capable of sustaining rallies without fresh demand, while also leaving Bitcoin vulnerable to abrupt moves when large orders arrive.
Bitcoin was also reported to be trading about 9% below its 200-day moving average, a widely watched long-term trend measure. The gap is relatively modest compared with some previous bear-market extremes, yet BTC has remained below that threshold long enough for it to serve as a barrier rather than a source of support.
The ETF inflows therefore stand out against an otherwise subdued backdrop. Continued demand through the funds would provide a visible counterweight to long-term holders releasing supply, while renewed outflows could leave Bitcoin reliant on a quieter spot market. For now, VanEck’s data describes a market marked by stress signals, reduced turnover and a narrowing contest between new institutional demand and supply from previously dormant coins.
Curious about BTC’s next move? Learn how to navigate volatility in our Bitcoin trading strategies guide now.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
