CleanSpark, BitFuFu and Canaan each produced less Bitcoin in July than in June, extending a second consecutive monthly decline for the three publicly listed miners despite Bitcoin recovering from its late-June slide. The results show that a rising Bitcoin price alone did not offset changes in operating hashrate, cloud-mining capacity and site-level disruptions.
CleanSpark mined 586 BTC during July, down about 5% from 614 BTC in June, according to the company’s monthly production update. BitFuFu produced 112 BTC, compared with 125 BTC a month earlier, while Canaan’s output fell most sharply, dropping 28% to 46 BTC from 64 BTC.
Bitcoin’s market performance moved in the opposite direction over the month. Historical price data from CoinGecko show Bitcoin began July near $58,500 and ended close to $62,800, recovering part of the selloff that had taken it from roughly $73,500 at the beginning of June to about $58,500 by month-end.
The production figures underline how mining companies remain exposed to factors that do not move in lockstep with Bitcoin’s price, particularly computing capacity, machine availability and electricity costs. A miner can receive more dollars for each Bitcoin it produces while still reporting fewer coins if its active fleet contracts or its facilities face interruptions.
Cleanspark’s operating hashrate declined in july
CleanSpark reported average operating hashrate of 20.8 exahashes per second in July, about 9% below June’s average. Its average daily production was 18.9 BTC, down from roughly 20.5 BTC per day in the previous month.
The company ended July holding 13,931 BTC, according to its update. That balance placed CleanSpark among the larger publicly traded corporate holders of Bitcoin, although miners’ treasury positions can change quickly as companies sell coins to cover operating costs, fund expansion or manage debt.
CleanSpark also disclosed a 20-year agreement tied to its Sandersville, Georgia, campus with an unnamed technology company. The arrangement was described as a $6.6 billion lease, providing the miner with a potential source of long-term revenue beyond block rewards. Such agreements are increasingly watched by equity traders because they can connect mining sites and power infrastructure with demand from high-performance computing and data-center customers.
CleanSpark shares rose 1.8% to $12.30 on Monday and were up about 6.4% for the year, based on the figures provided. The market reaction contrasted sharply with the performance of BitFuFu and Canaan, whose shares remained substantially lower year to date.
Bitfufu’s cloud-mining business accounted for most of its decline
BitFuFu’s total hashrate under management fell about 7% from June, with the decline concentrated in cloud-mining operations. The company’s cloud-mining output dropped to 40 BTC in July from 55 BTC in June.
Its self-mining business provided a partial offset. Self-mining produced 72 BTC in July, up from 70 BTC in June, indicating that the company’s owned or directly operated machines performed more steadily than its cloud-mining segment.
The split is relevant because cloud-mining revenue depends on contracted capacity and the operational performance of the underlying machines, while self-mining gives the company more direct exposure to Bitcoin rewards and costs. A reduction in managed cloud capacity can therefore lower reported Bitcoin output even when a company’s own mining fleet remains stable.
BitFuFu ended July with 1,314 BTC, down from 1,671 BTC at the end of June. The company attributed the decline to advance payments associated with future hashrate capacity. Its holdings ranked around 36th among public-company Bitcoin treasuries, according to the supplied figures.
BitFuFu shares fell 5.5% to $1.37 on Monday and were down more than 50% for the year. The share decline reflects the pressure on smaller mining-related companies whose revenues remain sensitive to fleet utilization and access to capital, even when Bitcoin itself rebounds.
Canaan cited texas wildfire disruption
Canaan mined 46 BTC in July, its lowest output among the three companies in absolute terms and the largest monthly percentage decline. The company said its joint-venture operations were stabilizing after wildfire disruptions at the Alborz site in Texas.
Weather-related disruptions can have an outsized effect on smaller mining operations because lost operating hours immediately reduce the number of hashing attempts a fleet can make. Unlike many industrial businesses, mining revenue is tied to a constantly changing competition for a fixed stream of block rewards, meaning idle machines surrender potential output to other miners connected to the network.
Canaan finished July with 1,917 BTC and 3,952 ETH on its balance sheet. The company also authorized management to monetize part of its cryptocurrency treasury to fund share repurchases, linking its digital-asset reserves directly to a capital-return strategy.
Canaan shares slipped about 1% to $0.23 on Monday and were down more than 70% for the year. The company has faced pressure both as a Bitcoin miner and as a manufacturer of mining hardware, leaving its equity exposed to shifts in equipment demand as well as mining profitability.
The July reports place a sharper focus on operational execution as miners pursue longer-term infrastructure arrangements. CleanSpark’s Sandersville agreement points toward data-center leasing as one possible avenue for diversifying revenue, while BitFuFu’s cloud-mining decline and Canaan’s Texas disruption show how quickly monthly output can weaken when capacity is reduced or facilities are interrupted.
Want deeper insight into miners’ profitability as BTC swings? Explore advanced charts on our crypto markets dashboard today.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
