BIT, formerly known as Matrixport, has formed a strategic partnership with fintech company Techtanium to develop tokenised-asset infrastructure for banks and financial institutions, beginning with products linked to physical precious metals through BIT's Matrixdock platform.
The partnership is aimed at a persistent obstacle in institutional tokenisation: issuing a blockchain token is only one part of the process. Banks also need systems for managing the underlying asset, safeguarding tokens, settling trades, maintaining records, and connecting each activity to existing account, payment, and ledger systems. BIT and Techtanium plan to combine their respective platforms to address those operational requirements.
Matrixdock will provide experience in real-world asset issuance, reserve management, on-chain settlement and product operations. Techtanium will contribute its Digital Finance OS, or DFOS, along with banking technology and systems-integration services. The companies said the work will focus on institution-ready tools rather than standalone token products aimed solely at crypto-native users.
Linking tokenisation to bank operations
Banks considering tokenised assets face a systems-integration challenge that is often more complex than creating the token itself. A token linked to gold, a bond, a fund share or another asset needs a clear connection between blockchain records and the institution's internal controls.
That connection can involve customer onboarding, subscriptions, custody arrangements, trade execution, settlement instructions, accounting entries, compliance checks and reporting. Each process may be handled by a different system inside a bank, including core banking software, payment rails and general-ledger infrastructure.
The BIT-Techtanium initiative is designed to place tokenised products within those established workflows. The approach could allow a bank to evaluate how an on-chain asset would fit alongside its existing client accounts and operational controls, rather than requiring the institution to build a separate digital-asset environment from scratch.
This focus places the partnership in a more practical part of the tokenisation market. Many tokenisation projects have concentrated on proving that an asset can be represented on a blockchain. Financial institutions also need to determine who manages reserves, how ownership records are reconciled, how transactions settle, and how clients can move between traditional cash systems and blockchain-based assets.
Matrixdock products form the starting point
Matrixdock's existing tokenised precious-metals products are expected to serve as an initial foundation for the bank-focused work. Its XAUm token is backed by physical gold and is structured around professional vault custody, reserve disclosures and verification procedures, independent audits, and a mechanism for physical redemption.
Those features address a central requirement for tokenised commodities: the token's usefulness depends on confidence in the underlying asset and the legal and operational process for claiming it. A gold-linked token may trade on a blockchain, but the reserve, custodian, redemption terms and reporting framework determine whether it functions as a credible representation of vaulted metal.
Matrixdock has also issued XAGm, a token linked to physical silver. The company applies its Fungible Reserve Standard, or FRS, framework to XAGm, with the mechanism intended to reflect costs associated with holding physical silver reserves.
The inclusion of both gold and silver products gives the partners specific use cases for testing how tokenised assets could be distributed, held and settled through bank-related systems. Precious metals are relatively straightforward assets for this purpose because they have identifiable physical reserves, established custody practices and long-standing market pricing conventions.
Custody, liquidity and financing in scope
The cooperation plan extends beyond the initial issuance of tokenised assets. The companies identified custody, trading, liquidity and financing as related services that could be developed around bank use of tokenised products.
These services are closely connected. A bank offering a tokenised asset to clients would need to decide whether it holds private keys directly, uses a third-party custodian, or supports client-controlled wallets. Trading requires liquidity arrangements and execution processes, while financing or collateral use introduces questions about valuation, settlement finality and risk management.
Matrixdock said its operational work around XAUm has included on-chain trading, liquidity and collateral applications. That experience could help the partners examine how a bank might support a tokenised commodity beyond simple customer holdings.
Collateral use, in particular, would require more than an accurate reserve report. A lender or trading desk would need reliable pricing, enforceable custody arrangements and a mechanism to manage the asset if a borrower fails to meet obligations. The partnership has not set out specific bank products or launch dates, but its stated scope suggests an effort to build the operational components needed for such services.
A test of institutional tokenisation's practical limits
The agreement reflects a growing divide between tokenisation demonstrations and deployable financial infrastructure. A token can be issued quickly on a public or private blockchain. Integrating it with bank-grade client records, payment processes, accounting controls and asset servicing takes considerably more coordination.
BIT's Matrixdock brings the asset side of that equation, including reserve management and token operations. Techtanium brings systems intended to connect digital-finance functions with the technology stack used by financial institutions. Their combined model seeks to reduce the gap between an on-chain asset and the operational environment in which banks serve clients.
For banks, the immediate question is likely to be less about whether precious metals can be tokenised and more about whether tokenised holdings can be administered with the same clarity as conventional products. The partnership is built around that challenge: making subscriptions, holdings, trades, settlement and recordkeeping work across both blockchain networks and established banking systems.
Explore how banks bridge tokenised assets and RWAs in 2026—read this deep dive on tokenized RWAs next.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
