Balancer’s DAO is considering a proposal to wind down the decentralized finance protocol, cancel a previously approved BAL buyback, and distribute its remaining treasury assets to BAL holders who burn their tokens. The plan, submitted Monday by treasury council member and former Balancer Labs chief executive Marcus Hardt, would set the protocol on a timetable that extends into 2028, with the first redemption window scheduled to open at the end of May 2027.
The proposal estimates that Balancer’s treasury contains at least $9 million in tokens, though the final amount available for distribution would depend on an inventory of other DAO-controlled wallets, positions, wind-down expenses, later receipts, and unclaimed redemptions. Assets would be paid out in kind and on a pro-rata basis, meaning eligible BAL holders would receive a proportional share of the tokens held by the DAO rather than a cash payout.
A Snapshot vote is expected to run from Sept. 25 through Sept. 29. Balancer’s protocol and governance arrangements would remain unchanged until token holders vote on the plan.
A phased exit for the protocol
Hardt’s proposal outlines a controlled closure rather than an immediate shutdown of Balancer’s smart contracts. If token holders approve it, the DAO would stop pursuing new business development and move into a wind-down process designed to give liquidity providers and integrators time to withdraw or unwind positions.
Contributors would receive notice through Oct. 31, while Balancer liquidity pools would move to withdrawals-only status on Oct. 30. That change would prevent new deposits and trading activity in affected pools while allowing existing users to remove assets.
The timetable reflects the practical difficulty of closing a protocol with positions spread across smart contracts, liquidity pools, governance wallets, and multiple chains. A rushed shutdown could leave assets or administrative responsibilities unresolved, while an extended schedule also creates ongoing operational costs that reduce the final treasury available to BAL holders.
The first redemption period would begin at the end of May 2027 and remain open for six months. During that period, BAL holders would burn tokens to receive their share of the assets allocated to the distribution.
BAL held by the DAO treasury would be excluded from the calculation, preventing the treasury from effectively claiming a portion of its own assets. The proposal includes a limited exception involving tetuBAL, a liquid-staking wrapper connected to BAL.
Treasury distribution would continue after the first claim window
The initial distribution would not necessarily be the final payment to participating addresses. Within two months of the first redemption window closing, the DAO would send a second-round airdrop to the same addresses.
That airdrop would cover assets that remain after wind-down costs, funds received later in the process, and the value linked to BAL tokens that were eligible but never redeemed. The structure gives claimants who participate in the first window an interest in assets that become available after the initial treasury calculation.
A final sweep would follow six months later, distributing any remaining inflows. The multiple-stage approach is intended to close out the DAO’s residual balances without requiring users to return repeatedly to submit new claims.
The proposal would also cancel a BAL buyback previously approved by governance. Redirecting those funds into the redemption pool places liquidation of the DAO’s remaining assets ahead of efforts to support the BAL token through open-market purchases.
Closure follows exploit and shutdown of Balancer Labs
The wind-down proposal follows the closure of Balancer Labs roughly six months ago. The corporate entity cited a Nov. 3, 2025 exploit that drained about $128 million from Balancer v2 pools across multiple chains, according to the material accompanying the proposal.
The attack came after a long decline from Balancer’s earlier peak. Total value locked on the protocol reached about $3.3 billion in 2021, then fell to roughly $800 million shortly before the late-2025 exploit, according to the supplied figures. Balancer now holds about $158 million in total value locked.
Those numbers help explain why the DAO is considering a final distribution rather than a turnaround plan. Lower liquidity reduces trading activity and fee generation, leaving fewer resources to fund development, security work, and efforts to attract new users. The proposal argues that continuing operations would consume treasury assets without a clear route to restoring a sustainable protocol.
The core team had reportedly attempted to operate with about 12 contributors, but the costs of user-acquisition incentives and the burden created by the exploit left limited room for a renewed growth strategy. Legal exposure tied to the breach also weighed on Balancer Labs before its closure, according to earlier comments referenced in the material.
What BAL holders and users would need to watch
The vote would decide whether the outlined redemption process proceeds, rather than immediately distributing assets. A rejection would leave Balancer governance to develop another plan for its treasury, contracts, contributors, and remaining protocol operations.
For users with liquidity positions, the proposed Oct. 30 withdrawals-only transition is the first operational deadline. Liquidity providers would need to monitor which pools are covered and ensure they understand any pool-specific mechanics before the protocol moves into its restricted phase.
For BAL holders, the proposal links treasury distributions to burning tokens during the planned redemption period. The Snapshot vote in September concerns governance approval of the wind-down proposal; the document’s described distribution mechanism is the later token-burn redemption process beginning in May 2027.
If approved, Balancer would join the small but growing group of DeFi projects confronting whether a decentralized treasury can be more valuable as a continuing operating fund or as a final distribution to token holders after the protocol’s business case has weakened.
As DeFi protocols evolve or wind down, explore new yield opportunities with Toobit’s DeFi income strategies guide.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
