SpaceX shares fell more than 5% to around $149 on July 7, delivering a weak first session as a member of the Nasdaq-100 and undercutting expectations that index-linked buying would support the stock.
The move came even as traders had expected roughly $4 billion to $6 billion of demand from funds that track the Nasdaq-100, which is followed by products managing about $800 billion in global assets. The selloff showed that forced buying from index funds does not always translate into sustained gains, especially when a stock has already rallied ahead of a widely anticipated index inclusion.
SpaceX completed its initial public offering at $135 a share on June 11, with trading starting the following day under the ticker SPCX. Less than a month later, Nasdaq confirmed that the company would be added to the benchmark index. That announcement sparked heavy positioning before the effective date, leaving the stock vulnerable to profit-taking once the actual inclusion arrived.
The decline also came during a softer session for technology and semiconductor shares. Risk appetite toward high-growth companies weakened on July 7, adding pressure to SpaceX at a moment when short-term traders were already looking for an opportunity to sell into index-related liquidity.
The Nasdaq-100 inclusion was an important milestone for SpaceX, placing the company alongside some of the largest and most actively traded growth names in the U.S. market. But the stock’s first day in the index suggested that the next stage of trading will depend less on mechanical demand and more on earnings, share supply, Starlink growth, Starship progress and the company’s ability to justify a valuation that already reflects ambitious long-term expectations.
Index buying meets early selling
Index inclusion often creates a straightforward source of demand. Funds that replicate the Nasdaq-100 need to buy the newly added stock so their portfolios match the index. In theory, that can create upward pressure, particularly when a company has a large market value and limited public float.
In practice, the effect is often more complicated. Traders frequently buy shares before the official inclusion date, expecting index funds to become forced buyers later. When those funds arrive, short-term traders may use the liquidity to exit positions. That can absorb the passive demand and turn what appears to be a bullish event into a selling opportunity.
That pattern appeared to play out with SpaceX. The Nasdaq announcement came soon after the IPO, giving the market several weeks to prepare. By the time the stock officially entered the Nasdaq-100, much of the expected buying may already have been reflected in the price.
The scale of expected demand was large, but not necessarily large enough to overwhelm early selling. With $4 billion to $6 billion of estimated passive inflows, the inclusion created a clear event for traders. Yet once the stock traded near $149, up from the $135 IPO price but below the levels some had expected after the index addition, sellers found enough demand to reduce exposure.
The result was a familiar market outcome: the event mattered, but the anticipation mattered more.
A fast move from IPO to major index
SpaceX’s journey from public listing to Nasdaq-100 membership moved unusually quickly. The company priced its IPO at $135 a share on June 11, and trading began the next day under SPCX. The listing drew strong attention because of the company’s central role in commercial space launch, satellite internet and reusable rocket development.
The rapid index addition intensified attention on the stock. Many newly public companies spend far longer building a public trading record before joining a major benchmark. SpaceX’s size, profile and trading activity helped position it for an early entry.
That same speed may have increased volatility. In the first weeks after an IPO, the market is still trying to determine a fair valuation. Traders are assessing float, potential selling from early shareholders, growth projections, management commentary and early trading patterns. Adding a major index event during that early period can amplify both buying and selling pressure.
For SpaceX, the index inclusion arrived before the company had reported its first quarterly results as a public company. That left the market to trade largely on expectations rather than fresh public earnings data. The stock’s decline on July 7 showed that index membership alone was not enough to settle the debate over valuation.
Broader tech weakness adds pressure
SpaceX’s decline did not happen in isolation. Technology and semiconductor shares also weakened on July 7, as traders reduced exposure to some high-growth names. That broader pressure created a less supportive backdrop for a company whose valuation depends heavily on future expansion.
High-growth stocks are often sensitive to shifts in market confidence. When traders become more cautious, they tend to focus more closely on near-term earnings, cash flow, margins and valuation. Companies with large future growth assumptions can face sharper moves because a significant portion of their market value is tied to revenue that may not arrive for years.
SpaceX sits directly in that category. Its current valuation reflects not only its known businesses, including launch services and Starlink, but also expectations for Starship, future space infrastructure, possible orbital data networks and AI-related services. That makes the stock especially responsive to changes in sentiment around long-duration growth.
The July 7 session combined several pressures at once: index-event profit-taking, broader weakness in technology shares and growing attention to future share supply. Together, those factors outweighed the support from passive fund buying.
Share supply becomes a key issue
Beyond the index event, traders are closely watching SpaceX’s upcoming share unlocking schedule. Filings show that about 20% of early-stage vested shares could become eligible for sale after the company’s first earnings report. Another 10% could become eligible depending on price conditions.
That potential increase in market supply is important. When more shares become available for sale, the stock may need stronger demand to maintain or increase its price. If early employees, founders, venture backers or other pre-IPO holders choose to sell, the available float can expand and weigh on trading.
The market often begins pricing in such events before they occur. Even if not all eligible holders sell immediately, the expectation of possible supply can make fresh buyers more cautious. Traders may wait to see how much stock actually comes to market before taking larger positions.
SpaceX’s weak response to index-related demand may have reinforced that concern. If the stock could not rise on a day when passive funds were expected to buy billions of dollars’ worth of shares, traders may ask how it will perform when additional supply becomes available after earnings.
That does not mean the stock must fall when the lock-up schedule changes. Strong earnings, upbeat guidance or major operational progress could absorb the impact. But the unlocking schedule has become one of the main near-term variables for the stock.
Valuation debate remains wide open
Wall Street views on SpaceX remain sharply divided. Morgan Stanley’s Jonas team has set a $300 price target, with the space-launch segment valued at about $8 per share. Raymond James’s Gesuale has projected a far higher $800 target, based on long-term opportunities tied to orbital AI infrastructure in addition to Starship and Starlink.
The gap between those targets highlights the central question facing SpaceX: how much value should the market assign today to businesses that may not mature until 2030 or later?
At around $149 a share, SpaceX already carries a valuation that assumes major future growth. The company’s market capitalization is estimated near $2 trillion, placing it among the largest growth companies in the equity market. That valuation suggests traders are not simply paying for current launch revenue or satellite internet subscriptions. They are also assigning value to possible future markets, including space-based computing, advanced communications, defense applications and data infrastructure beyond Earth.
The challenge is that those future businesses remain difficult to model. SpaceX has demonstrated execution in reusable rockets and satellite deployment, but orbital AI infrastructure is still an emerging concept. Its revenue potential, cost structure, regulatory path and timeline are uncertain.
That uncertainty explains the wide spread between price targets. A lower target may still assume strong growth in launch and Starlink but discount more speculative future businesses. A higher target may assume that SpaceX becomes a core provider of next-generation orbital infrastructure, creating revenue streams far larger than today’s operations.
Starlink and Starship will be closely watched
The company’s first quarterly report as a public company, expected in August, is likely to become the next major valuation checkpoint. Traders will look for evidence that SpaceX’s core businesses are growing fast enough to support the market’s expectations.
Starlink will be a central focus. The satellite internet business is viewed as one of SpaceX’s clearest near-term revenue drivers. Projections for 2026 have pointed to around $15.5 billion in revenue from more than 7 million subscribers, though the market will want updated details on subscriber growth, pricing, churn, operating costs and margins.
Enterprise and government demand could also play a major role. Consumer broadband growth is important, but higher-margin contracts with businesses, defense agencies, airlines, maritime customers and remote infrastructure operators may have a larger impact on profitability. Any detail on those segments could influence whether traders view Starlink as a high-growth connectivity company or as a lower-margin satellite broadband provider.
Starship progress will be another key area. The vehicle is central to SpaceX’s long-term ambitions, including lower-cost launches, lunar and Mars missions, large-scale satellite deployment and possible future orbital infrastructure. Milestones around testing, launch cadence, payload capacity and cost reduction could shape views on the company’s long-range earnings power.
The market will also look for signs of early AI-related initiatives. While the idea of orbital AI infrastructure has helped fuel some bullish forecasts, traders will need more than a broad narrative. Contracts, technical milestones, capital expenditure plans or partnerships would provide a clearer basis for valuation.
The Tesla comparison
SpaceX’s weak inclusion-day performance resembles a pattern seen in other high-profile index additions. Tesla’s entry into the S&P 500 in December 2020 remains a notable example. Tesla shares rallied strongly between the announcement and the effective date, but performance became more muted once the index-related buying was completed.
The comparison is useful because it shows how headline demand can be anticipated and traded in advance. When an index inclusion becomes known, the market does not wait passively for the effective date. Traders adjust early, creating a rally before the event and often reducing the impact when the event actually occurs.
That dynamic appears relevant to SpaceX. Its Nasdaq-100 addition was a major event, but it was also easy to identify and prepare for. Once the official buying arrived, the stock faced sellers who had already captured earlier gains.
The lesson is not that index inclusion is unimportant. Membership in a major benchmark can improve liquidity, broaden ownership through passive products and increase visibility. But those benefits tend to matter over time, not necessarily on the first trading day after entry.
The next catalyst shifts to earnings
With the Nasdaq-100 event now behind it, SpaceX is likely to trade more like a large established growth stock than a pure IPO momentum story. The company will still attract attention because of its brand, leadership, technology and ambitious plans. But the market will increasingly demand measurable results.
The August earnings report will be the first major test. Strong revenue growth, expanding Starlink margins, clear Starship milestones or credible AI infrastructure updates could help the stock recover from its weak index debut. On the other hand, slower growth, limited disclosure, rising costs or heavy post-lock-up selling could pressure the shares further.
For now, the July 7 decline shows that passive demand has limits. Nasdaq-100 membership gives SpaceX a larger stage, but it does not remove questions about valuation, future share supply or execution risk.
SpaceX’s long-term story remains unusually broad, spanning launch services, satellite internet, reusable vehicles, space logistics and possible orbital computing. The stock’s near-term direction, however, may depend on simpler factors: whether earnings confirm the growth story, whether new share supply is absorbed smoothly and whether traders remain willing to pay today for revenue that may still be years away.
Explore tokenized stock volatility and institutional flows in our latest market outlook—read the full analysis on crypto and DeFi in 2025.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
