Public companies sharply reduced Bitcoin purchases last week, adding only about $1.33 million worth of the cryptocurrency, a 98.4% drop from the previous week, according to company filings and market data. The slowdown came as broader financial markets faced rising volatility, tighter liquidity conditions and renewed concern that the Federal Reserve could keep monetary policy restrictive for longer.
Strategy, one of the largest publicly traded Bitcoin-treasury companies, made no new Bitcoin purchases during the period. Instead, the company increased its cash reserves to $3.23 billion, official filings showed. The move stood out because Strategy has been among the most aggressive corporate buyers of Bitcoin in recent years and is often seen as a benchmark for the digital-asset treasury model.
Across public companies excluding miners, Bitcoin holdings reached about 1,139,656 coins, valued at roughly $73.76 billion. That total represented around 5.7% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply. The figure underlined how significant public-company balance sheets have become in the Bitcoin market, even as weekly buying activity slowed to near a standstill.
Only one company, Strive, reported a Bitcoin purchase during the period. It acquired 21 coins at an average price of $63,221, with weekly buying data putting the transaction value at roughly $1.33 million. The purchase was small compared with previous weeks, when corporate treasury activity had been much stronger.
The slowdown in direct corporate buying coincided with a shift toward regulated market products. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $226.8 million in daily inflows on July 20, according to fund-flow data, while spot Ethereum ETFs attracted $18 million on the same day. The figures suggested that traders and asset managers were still allocating capital to digital assets, but were doing so through traditional financial products rather than direct additions to corporate treasuries.
Strategy holds back as cash rises
Strategy’s decision to pause Bitcoin purchases and build cash reserves marked one of the most important developments of the week. The company has long used equity and debt markets to fund Bitcoin purchases, and its balance sheet strategy has influenced other public firms seeking exposure to digital assets.
Its cash position rose to $3.23 billion, giving the company more flexibility during a period of market stress. Higher cash reserves can help public companies manage debt obligations, operating expenses and market shocks without being forced to sell crypto holdings during periods of weak pricing.
The pause did not mean Strategy reduced its Bitcoin exposure. The company made no new acquisitions, but it continued to hold one of the largest Bitcoin treasuries among public companies. Its stock also remained a key route for traditional market participants seeking indirect exposure to Bitcoin.
Major asset managers expanded holdings in Strategy’s shares during the period. Vanguard’s Mid-Cap Value ETF added 83,093 shares worth about $8.16 million, bringing its total position to 2.12 million shares valued at approximately $209 million.
Swedbank also increased its position, adding 8,278 shares. That raised its total holding to 90,590 shares, valued at about $8.81 million. Capital Group’s Growth ETF bought 80,240 shares worth around $7.78 million, lifting its stake to 1.66 million shares valued at approximately $161.39 million.
The share purchases showed that while some companies slowed direct Bitcoin accumulation, exposure through publicly traded equities remained active. Strategy’s stock continues to function as a proxy for Bitcoin-linked balance sheet exposure in traditional portfolios.
Public-company Bitcoin holdings remain large
Even with the sharp weekly slowdown, public-company Bitcoin holdings remained substantial. The total of roughly 1.14 million coins held by public firms excluding miners represented a large share of available Bitcoin supply.
That level of ownership has become an important market factor because Bitcoin’s supply is fixed and a large portion of coins are held long term. When public companies buy aggressively, they can reduce available supply and reinforce bullish sentiment. When they stop buying, traders often interpret the pause as a sign of caution or reduced liquidity.
Last week’s slowdown was especially notable because it came after a period of stronger treasury accumulation. A 98.4% drop in weekly purchases showed how quickly corporate behavior can shift when macroeconomic risk rises.
The change also suggested that corporate treasuries are becoming more sensitive to financing costs. Borrowing remains expensive compared with the near-zero-rate environment that supported risk-taking during previous crypto cycles. When capital costs rise, companies have less room to fund aggressive digital-asset purchases, especially if share prices are under pressure or credit markets become less favorable.
BitMine nears Ethereum holding target
While Bitcoin treasury activity slowed, BitMine, an Ethereum-treasury company, reported total assets of $11.5 billion, including crypto holdings, cash and securities. The company said its Ethereum holdings rose to 5.78 million coins, equal to about 4.8% of total circulation and close to its stated 5% target.
BitMine added 7,430 ETH during the week. It also said around 4.9 million ETH are staked through validator networks and partners, representing about 85% of its treasury. Staking allows holders to help secure the Ethereum network and earn rewards, though it can involve operational, liquidity and counterparty risks depending on how the assets are managed.
The company’s large staking position is central to its business model. BitMine reported $45.7 million in staking and validation revenue generated by its MAVAN platform for the three months ending May 31. That amount represented 98% of total revenue for the period.
BitMine also reported holdings of 207 Bitcoin and $385 million in cash and securities. The cash and securities position gives the company a buffer at a time when digital-asset companies are facing larger price swings and more cautious capital markets.
In addition, BitMine repurchased 5.5 million shares under a previously authorized $4 billion buyback program. Share repurchases can reduce the number of shares outstanding and may support earnings per share, but they also use cash that could otherwise be applied to acquisitions, debt reduction or further crypto purchases.
HypeStrat valuation falls below asset value
The market net asset value, or mNAV, of HypeStrat, a digital-asset treasury model company, fell to a long-term low of 0.87 times. After taxes, the ratio was reported at 0.80 times.
The mNAV ratio is often watched in treasury-style companies because it compares market value with underlying asset value. A ratio above 1.0 can indicate that the market is assigning a premium to the company’s strategy, management or future buying capacity. A ratio below 1.0 can suggest that shares are trading at a discount to reported asset value.
HypeStrat made no new acquisitions during the period and kept its existing treasury allocation unchanged. The low mNAV showed the pressure facing some digital-asset treasury companies as traders reassessed balance sheet strategies under tighter financial conditions.
A falling mNAV can create challenges for companies that rely on share issuance to buy more crypto. If a company’s shares trade at a discount to asset value, raising new equity may become less attractive because it can dilute existing shareholders without adding proportional value.
ETFs attract capital as direct buying slows
The week’s data pointed to a rotation rather than a full retreat from digital assets. While public companies slowed direct Bitcoin purchases, spot Bitcoin ETFs brought in $226.8 million in a single day on July 20. Spot Ethereum ETFs also recorded $18 million in daily inflows.
The shift suggested that some traders preferred regulated funds during a period of uncertainty. ETFs offer exposure through familiar brokerage and custody channels, which can be more attractive during volatile markets than direct corporate treasury strategies or unmanaged crypto holdings.
For asset managers, ETFs can also provide easier reporting, liquidity and risk controls. That may explain why fund flows remained positive even as corporate Bitcoin buying slowed.
Still, ETF inflows and corporate treasury buying affect markets differently. ETF inflows represent demand for fund shares that are backed by underlying assets, while corporate treasury accumulation changes the structure and risk profile of individual public companies. Both can support digital-asset demand, but they carry different implications for balance sheets, share valuations and liquidity.
Broader markets turn more defensive
The slowdown in crypto treasury activity came as traditional equity markets showed rising signs of stress. Short positions in the S&P 500 climbed to 3.79%, while short positions in the Russell 3000 rose to 6.3%. Both levels were the highest since 2010.
The increase in short interest showed that traders were positioning more defensively across U.S. equities. Bearish bets increased as technology and semiconductor shares came under pressure.
The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell about 20% from its peak, signaling a sharp correction in one of the market’s most important growth sectors. Chipmakers led the losses. AMD fell more than 7%, Intel declined more than 6%, and TSMC dropped more than 5%.
The weakness in semiconductors mattered for digital-asset markets because risk assets often move together during periods of stress. When traders reduce exposure to high-growth equities, they may also cut exposure to cryptocurrencies and crypto-linked stocks.
Fed policy remains a central risk
Federal Reserve policy remained a key driver of market sentiment. Testimony from the Fed Chair and other officials strengthened expectations that monetary policy could remain tight as inflation concerns persisted.
Consumer price data offered some relief, with the United States June inflation rate falling to 3.5% from 4.2% in May. Even so, markets remained cautious because inflation was still above the Fed’s long-term target.
The combination of lower inflation but continued policy uncertainty created a difficult environment for risk assets. Traders had to weigh the possibility of future rate hikes or prolonged restrictive policy against signs that price pressures were easing.
Higher interest rates tend to reduce demand for speculative assets because safer instruments can offer more attractive yields. They also raise borrowing costs for companies that might otherwise use debt to finance acquisitions, buybacks or digital-asset purchases.
Cash and hedging gain importance
The recent behavior of public companies showed a clear move toward caution. Instead of aggressively buying more digital assets, several firms maintained or increased cash positions, protected balance sheets and relied more heavily on existing holdings.
That does not mean corporate interest in Bitcoin or Ethereum has disappeared. Public companies still control large amounts of both assets, and regulated ETFs continued to draw capital. But the pace of new direct buying slowed dramatically, reflecting a market that has become more selective and more sensitive to macroeconomic risks.
Market participants are also paying closer attention to hedging tools, including put options and futures contracts, as price swings remain elevated. Expectations for 10% to 15% moves in risk assets have increased the focus on protection strategies rather than aggressive buying during short-term rallies.
The immediate outlook for digital-asset treasury companies may depend on three factors: whether liquidity improves, whether the Federal Reserve signals a clearer policy path, and whether Bitcoin and Ethereum can hold important price levels after recent volatility.
For now, the data show a market in transition. Public-company Bitcoin purchases nearly stopped, Strategy built cash, BitMine continued expanding its Ethereum-centered model, and ETFs absorbed fresh capital. The result is not a collapse in digital-asset demand, but a more cautious and regulated form of participation as traders wait for clearer signals from monetary policy and broader markets.
Want deeper context on institutional sentiment? Explore how Fed policy shapes Bitcoin volatility and its impact on corporate treasury strategies.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
