Anfield should give Liverpool most of the ball. It has not always given them control of the game. Ipswich offered one version of their attack: Cody Gakpo found Alexander Isak before the defense could settle, and Liverpool finished moves before the opposition had time to slow them down. Nottingham Forest offered another. The possession was there, but the danger increasingly came at the other end.
Fulham arrive with the reverse problem. They have no points, yet their attack has not looked short of ideas. Alvaro Arbeloa's side generated 3.13 expected goals against Crystal Palace and led twice. Their problem came after those good moments, when the distances grew, a defender followed the ball, and the next runner found an opening.
Competition: Premier League
Matchweek: 4
Date and time: September 12, 2026, 3:00 p.m. British Summer Time / 2:00 p.m. Coordinated Universal Time
Place: Anfield, Liverpool, England
Liverpool still hold the stronger hand. The movement around Gakpo, Florian Wirtz, and Isak gives Andoni Iraola several ways to attack a defense that loses its spacing. The schedule complicates that advantage, though. Liverpool face Atletico Madrid three days earlier, which raises a fair question about how long their counterpress can remain sharp.
Fulham's answer cannot be ninety minutes around their own penalty area. They need Sander Berge to beat the first pressure, their wide runners to attack behind Liverpool's advancing full-backs, and Josh King to stay close enough to the midfield for the move to continue.
Liverpool are the more convincing pick, but a routine home win feels too simple. The game turns on whether their possession reaches Isak before Fulham settle or becomes the slower kind of control that gives the visitors room to break.
What the opening weeks have revealed
Liverpool's unbeaten start contains two different versions of the same side. At Ipswich, Cody Gakpo released Isak twice in the opening nine minutes. The attacks were quick, vertical, and finished before the home defense could settle. Liverpool then protected the advantage, adjusted their defensive shape, and recorded their first clean sheet of the league season.
The Nottingham Forest draw was a different test. Liverpool had 63% of the ball in the first half but created no big chances and only 0.25 expected goals (xG). Forest produced three big chances and 1.29 xG over the same period. Across the full match, Liverpool's 70% possession still left them behind Forest in xG, 1.61 to 2.30.
That contrast is more useful than the unbeaten label. Liverpool already look comfortable when a recovery opens the field for Gakpo, Wirtz, or Isak. Their attack has looked less settled against a patient shape that protects the center and waits for a mistake.
Fulham must decide which Liverpool they want to face. Pressing high offers a route to errors, but it also leaves Isak the space he has exploited best. Dropping off reduces that space, although it asks Fulham to defend repeated movements around their midfield line.
Fulham's results tell only part of the story. They lost 3-2 to Chelsea after competing closely in chance quality, then followed a 1-0 defeat at Sunderland with another 3-2 loss against Crystal Palace. Against Palace, Fulham led twice and finished with 3.13 xG to their opponent's 1.97.
The attacking evidence is encouraging. Josh King has scored in each of Fulham's last two home games, while Cesar Palacios has found useful positions between midfield and defense. The concern sits behind them. Fulham have allowed matches to become stretched, and their back line has struggled when a defender is pulled toward the ball and the next runner attacks the space left behind.
Preparation adds another layer. Liverpool face Atletico Madrid at Anfield three days before this game and then have a cup tie at Tottenham three days later. Fulham have a full week between the Palace defeat and the trip to Anfield.
Rest does not remove Liverpool's technical advantage, but it may affect how long Iraola's team can press at full speed and how aggressively both full-backs advance.
How Liverpool can take control
Liverpool's predicted base shape is a 4-2-3-1, with the option to change the back line after taking the lead. The lineup remains provisional because the Atletico Madrid match falls after the research cutoff and may change the availability picture.
Predicted Liverpool starting eleven (XI): Alisson; Ronald Araujo, Ibrahima Konate, Virgil van Dijk, Milos Kerkez; Ryan Gravenberch, Dominik Szoboszlai; Cody Gakpo, Florian Wirtz, Victor Munoz; Alexander Isak.
-
Move Fulham's first line before playing forward. Alisson and the center-backs do not have to force the opening pass. Gravenberch and Szoboszlai can draw Fulham's two advanced defenders inward, creating a lane toward Wirtz or Gakpo between the lines. If Fulham keep their midfield narrow, the next pass should go outside quickly rather than circulate harmlessly across the back.
-
Release Isak before the defense becomes square. Gakpo has supplied the final ball for Liverpool's three most recent league goals, all scored by Isak. At Ipswich, the decisive passes arrived early enough for the striker to finish without wrestling against a settled center-back pair. Fulham's defenders will want time to retreat and face the ball. Liverpool's best service denies them that comfort.
-
Use width to create inside space. Kerkez gives Liverpool a natural route down the left, while Araujo offers a more conservative interpretation on the opposite side. Their positioning affects Wirtz and Gakpo. A wide full-back can hold a Fulham midfielder near the touchline, leaving the half-space available for a forward-facing reception. If both full-backs advance together, however, Fulham's first pass after a regain becomes much more dangerous.
-
Counterpress with a spare defender. Liverpool's attack improves when the ball is recovered close to goal, but their defensive structure has not always survived the same aggression. Forest created better first-half chances with far less possession, and Liverpool have conceded four goals in three league games. Keeping one full-back deeper, or asking a midfielder to hold position behind Wirtz, would reduce the space available to Fulham's wide runners.
-
Know when to reduce the pace. Iraola changed the defensive structure after Liverpool went ahead at Ipswich, with Araujo moving more centrally and Szoboszlai helping on the right. A similar adjustment would make sense if Liverpool establish control here, especially after the Atletico game. Continuing to attack with six players when the match no longer requires it would give Fulham exactly the open field they want.
The change of speed is the point. Patient buildup should move Fulham out of position, then the decisive pass has to arrive quickly. If every phase is played at the same tempo, Fulham will have time to rebuild their midfield screen and Isak will spend too much of the game receiving with his back to goal.
Why Fulham are not a routine opponent
Fulham are also likely to begin in a 4-2-3-1, although their defensive shape may resemble a 4-4-2 when an attacking midfielder joins the striker. Tom Cairney's expected absence leaves an important decision in the double pivot, and the club's team news still requires a final check after the Palace match.
Predicted Fulham XI: Bernd Leno; Timothy Castagne, Jorge Cuenca, Joachim Andersen, Antonee Robinson; Sasa Lukic or Shea Charles, Sander Berge; Oscar Bobb, Cesar Palacios, Alex Iwobi; Josh King or Rodrigo Muniz.
-
Press the pass, not every defender. A constant high press would invite Liverpool to find Isak behind an exposed line. Fulham have a better chance if King and Palacios screen the central lane, then accelerate when the ball travels backward or toward a full-back facing his own goal. The aim is to make Liverpool play down one side without opening the whole pitch.
-
Make the first pass count. Berge is central to Fulham's escape. A regain means little if his first touch sends the ball sideways and allows Liverpool to close again. A clean pass toward Iwobi, Bobb, or Palacios forces a Liverpool midfielder to turn, while Robinson's forward run offers another way to attack the area behind the home side's right flank.
-
Keep King and Palacios close enough to combine. Fulham have scored four times despite losing every match. Their best moments have come when an attacker receives before the opposing defense resets, not when a lone striker contests an aimless clearance. King has provided the early strike, and Palacios has arrived from a deeper pocket. If the distance between them becomes too large, Fulham's threat will disappear after the first pass.
-
Protect the space created by the first defender. The loss to Palace showed the danger of one defender stepping out without the rest of the line adjusting. Liverpool will try to tempt Berge toward Wirtz, then send Isak through the opening behind him. Andersen and his partner cannot both follow the ball. One must engage while the other protects the run and the full-back narrows behind them.
Fulham's realistic path is not ninety minutes inside their own penalty area. Their attack has produced enough to trouble Liverpool, but only when the team stays connected around the first recovery. They need periods of possession, even short ones, to move Liverpool backward and give their defense time to reset.
Line-by-line comparison
|
Area |
Edge |
Why it matters |
|
Goalkeeper and first pass |
Liverpool |
Alisson gives Liverpool a calmer starting point when Fulham close the central lane, although his decision outside goal still needs discipline. |
|
Center-back organization |
Liverpool |
Van Dijk and Konate offer greater experience, but the edge narrows when Liverpool defend large spaces after both full-backs advance. |
|
Midfield access |
Liverpool |
Wirtz, Gravenberch, and Szoboszlai give the home side more ways to receive beyond Fulham's first line. |
|
Direct running behind |
Liverpool |
Isak's timing and Gakpo's service have already produced three league goals through the same basic relationship. |
|
Wide transition threat |
Fulham |
Iwobi, Bobb, and Robinson have a clear target if Liverpool lose the ball with the full-backs high. |
|
Rest and preparation |
Fulham |
Fulham have a full training week, while Liverpool play Atletico Madrid three days before the match. |
|
Game management |
Liverpool |
Liverpool protected an early lead at Ipswich; Fulham created enough to beat Palace but could not hold two advantages. |
Liverpool's most valuable edge is the speed of the pass into Isak, not their expected possession share. Fulham narrow the difference if Berge and Lukic keep Wirtz facing away from goal and turn the resulting regain into an immediate forward pass. That sequence would test the part of Liverpool's structure that has looked least secure.
Key tactical battle
The decisive contest begins around Fulham's double pivot and ends behind Liverpool's full-backs.
When Liverpool build through Gravenberch or Szoboszlai, Wirtz can move away from the center and receive in a half-space. Gakpo's position then becomes important. If he stays wide, a Fulham full-back has to respect the outside pass. If he moves inward, he can combine with Wirtz and draw one of Fulham's center-backs toward the ball. Isak waits for that defender to step before attacking the gap.
Fulham cannot solve this simply by asking Berge to follow Wirtz everywhere. Moving too far from the central screen would open a pass toward Isak's feet or create room for Szoboszlai near the penalty arc. Staying too deep carries a different cost. Wirtz receives facing goal, with time to select the runner rather than protect the ball.
The visitors' safest answer is likely a narrow midfield line that passes Wirtz between players and accepts some Liverpool possession outside. Castagne and Robinson would then have to judge when to press Gakpo or Munoz. A late step allows a cross or cutback; an early one leaves the channel beside the center-back exposed.
Liverpool also face a decision. Sending both full-backs beyond the ball would stretch Fulham, but it would leave fewer players ready for the next phase. If Fulham recover possession, Berge's first forward pass can find Palacios inside or Iwobi and Bobb moving into the channel. King then has to occupy a center-back long enough for the supporting runner to arrive.
Iraola can protect that risk by holding Araujo deeper while Kerkez advances, creating a back three in possession. Arbeloa can answer by directing Fulham's first transition toward Liverpool's higher left side instead of attacking the more protected flank.
Those choices influence more than territory. They determine whether the next chance is a Liverpool cutback against a retreating defense or a Fulham break against two isolated center-backs.
Watch Wirtz's body position and Berge's first pass. If Wirtz repeatedly turns toward goal, Liverpool are moving Fulham's midfield. If Berge receives a regain with time to look forward, the home side's control is much less secure than its possession figure suggests.
Match scenarios
Liverpool score early
An early Liverpool goal would force Fulham to reconsider the selective press. Keeping the same cautious height would preserve the deficit but give Liverpool control of the clock. Moving Palacios closer to King and releasing the full-backs would offer a better route back, although it would also open more space for Gakpo and Isak.
Liverpool would not need to press with the same intensity for the full match. Iraola could keep one full-back deeper, slow the buildup, and ask Fulham to chase. A later switch toward a back five would also protect the lead and reduce the physical cost of playing three days after Atletico Madrid.
The match would become more open if Fulham commit another attacker after halftime. Liverpool's best chances would then come in transition rather than through long spells around the box. Fulham would need their first forward pass to survive the counterpress instead of returning the ball immediately.
The likely score range is Liverpool 2-0 Fulham to Liverpool 3-1 Fulham. The swing factor is whether Fulham create one clean chance before Liverpool settle into game-management mode.
The match is level at halftime
A level score would raise a more uncomfortable question for Liverpool. If the first half resembles the Forest game, possession alone would say little. The useful evidence would be the number of forward-facing receptions for Wirtz, the quality of Isak's touches, and whether Fulham have carried the ball beyond Liverpool's first recovery line.
Fulham would benefit from keeping the contest slow for another ten or fifteen minutes. Their full week of preparation becomes more relevant as Liverpool approach the final third of a demanding eight-day run. Arbeloa could refresh the wide positions to keep an outlet available rather than add a second striker too soon.
Liverpool's adjustment would probably involve greater width or a fresher winger, not simply pushing more players into the same central space. The game may open after the hour as the full-backs advance and both coaches use their benches.
The likely score range is Liverpool 1-0 Fulham, Liverpool 1-1 Fulham, and Liverpool 2-1 Fulham. The first clean pass behind an advanced full-back could decide which side breaks the deadlock.
Fulham score first
A Fulham opener would create the strongest route to an away result, but it would not complete the job. Palace came from behind twice before beating Fulham, so the visitors would have to defend the next phase more calmly than they have so far.
Liverpool would move Wirtz closer to the penalty area, advance the full-backs, and sustain more pressure around Fulham's box. That increases the number of crosses and second balls, yet it also leaves the home side vulnerable to the exact transition that produced the opening goal.
Fulham should not retreat immediately into a 5-4-1 and abandon every outlet. Keeping King available, with Palacios or Iwobi near enough to receive the next pass, would make Liverpool hesitate before committing another player. Fresh wide legs later in the match could be more useful than another central defender if Fulham still need to escape pressure.
The plausible score range is Liverpool 1-1 Fulham, Liverpool 2-1 Fulham, or Liverpool 1-2 Fulham. Fulham's ability to keep the ball for short spells after taking the lead is the main swing factor.
Players to watch
-
Alexander Isak of Liverpool: Isak starts between the center-backs but looks for the shoulder of the defender drawn toward Gakpo or Wirtz. Success means receiving while moving toward goal, as he did for his two early finishes at Ipswich. If Fulham keep him facing away from goal, Liverpool lose their most efficient route into the box.
-
Cody Gakpo of Liverpool: Gakpo links Liverpool's possession to Isak's movement. He can deliver from a wide position or move inside before releasing the striker. His challenge is choosing the moment rather than forcing the pass. Losing the ball while Kerkez advances would expose Liverpool's left side to Fulham's counterattack.
-
Josh King of Fulham: King has scored in Fulham's last two home matches and offers more than a penalty-box presence. He must occupy Van Dijk or Konate, protect the first forward pass, and give Palacios time to join. If Liverpool isolate him from the midfield, Fulham's attacks will end before their wide runners become involved.
-
Cesar Palacios of Fulham: Palacios is the connection between the recovery and the final attack. Receiving behind Liverpool's midfield would let him turn toward the full-back channels or combine with King. His defensive role is just as important because Fulham may use him beside the striker to screen Liverpool's first central pass. If he chases too high, Wirtz gains the space behind him.
Liverpool vs Fulham prediction
Probability view for 90 minutes plus stoppage time
-
Liverpool win: 56%
-
Draw: 25%
-
Fulham win: 19%
Main score prediction
Liverpool 2-1 Fulham
Alternative score prediction
Liverpool 2-2 Fulham
Liverpool receive the largest share because the Gakpo-Isak connection attacks the space Fulham have struggled to protect once a midfielder or center-back steps toward the ball. Anfield, greater depth, and Iraola's ability to change the defensive shape after taking a lead strengthen that case.
The figure stays below a dominant home forecast for clear reasons. Liverpool were out-created by Forest despite controlling possession, and Fulham's 3.13 xG against Palace shows that their attack is not performing like a team with no points. The visitors also arrive with a full week to prepare while Liverpool play Atletico Madrid three days earlier.
The 2-1 score reflects both sides' early-season patterns. Liverpool have the sharper direct route, but their rest defense remains vulnerable when the press is beaten. A 2-2 draw becomes the stronger alternative if Fulham score first, or if Liverpool's rotation removes speed from the counterpress.
This prediction covers 90 minutes plus stoppage time only.
Match outlook
Liverpool have the stronger case, but the gap is narrower than the league table suggests. Their best football in the opening weeks has come from quick service into Isak, while Fulham have created enough to punish the spaces left behind an aggressive press.
The home side should produce the better chances if Wirtz and Gakpo receive before Fulham's shape settles. A heavy post-Atletico rotation, followed by a Fulham opening goal, would change the balance quickly and turn a controlled Liverpool win into a much less predictable game.
How to use Toobit Prediction Market
Toobit Prediction Market offers event-based markets for sports and other global events where available. For Liverpool vs Fulham, the most useful reference points are Liverpool's first-half chance quality, the timing of the first goal, Fulham's success with their first forward pass, and whether Liverpool's press loses intensity after halftime.
Before participating, review the outcomes and terms displayed for the relevant market, along with the participation amount, account requirements, and product risks. Availability and outcomes remain subject to what is shown on the platform.
Explore Toobit Prediction Market now.
Risk warning
Prediction-market outcomes are uncertain, and participation involves risk. Review the applicable terms before taking part. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.
