The Ethereum Foundation is undergoing one of the most significant organizational changes in its history, with layoffs, senior departures, the closure of a key protocol support team, and the rise of independent groups that aim to take over parts of the foundation’s previous work.
The shift marks a major change in how Ethereum’s research, institutional outreach, and technical support may be funded and coordinated in the years ahead. It also comes at a sensitive time for the network, as Ethereum sees high staking participation, rising attention from traditional finance, and greater reliance on public funds such as spot Ethereum ETFs.
On June 23, the Ethereum Foundation announced that it had laid off 54 employees, equal to about 20% of its workforce. The foundation also confirmed that its protocol support unit would be dissolved. The move was described as the largest staff reduction since the organization was created.
The restructuring has been accompanied by the departures of at least eight senior members, including former co-executive director Wang Xiaowei. These exits point to a broader internal reset as the foundation reduces its direct operational role and encourages more work to be handled by independent groups across the Ethereum ecosystem.
The changes are not only about staffing. They signal a wider move away from a system in which one central nonprofit carried much of the responsibility for research, coordination, and institutional engagement. Instead, Ethereum’s future development appears likely to depend more heavily on a network of outside nonprofits, private research groups, corporate labs, and public-facing organizations.
That transition could change how Ethereum upgrades are designed, funded, and explained to banks, asset managers, developers, and traders.
A smaller role for the Ethereum Foundation
The Ethereum Foundation has long played a central role in supporting the network’s technical development, research priorities, public goods funding, and ecosystem coordination. While Ethereum itself is decentralized, the foundation has often acted as an important source of organization and financial backing for protocol-related work.
The latest restructuring suggests that role is being narrowed.
Recent public comments from Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin have pointed toward a foundation that is smaller, more focused, and less dominant over the long term. The idea is not to remove the foundation from Ethereum’s development, but to reduce reliance on a single body and encourage more independent centers of responsibility.
That approach fits with Ethereum’s broader culture of decentralization. However, it also creates practical questions. If the Ethereum Foundation is smaller, other organizations will need to pick up work that still requires money, leadership, and technical expertise.
Those responsibilities include research into scalability, protocol safety, wallet usability, institutional adoption, regulatory education, and developer support. Some of that work may be handled by new nonprofits. Some may be funded by companies that depend on Ethereum infrastructure. Some may come from universities, public goods programs, or organizations created by former foundation staff.
The result is likely to be a more distributed but also more complex system of coordination.
Former Ethereum Foundation staff launch new groups
Several former Ethereum Foundation researchers and contributors have already moved to create independent organizations focused on areas that were once more closely tied to the foundation’s work.
Five former foundation team members have launched Ethlabs, a nonprofit research organization. The group is supported by Joe Lubin and several blockchain-focused institutions. Its stated goal is to help advance Ethereum as a global financial settlement network.
Ethlabs is expected to focus on research and technical work connected to Ethereum’s use in large-scale financial systems. That includes questions around settlement, security, financial infrastructure, and how Ethereum can support value transfer at institutional scale.
A second organization, Ethereum Institutional, was introduced on July 1 by three additional former Ethereum Foundation contributors. Its focus is institutional adoption, including engagement with banks, asset managers, and other financial organizations that are exploring blockchain infrastructure.
Ethereum Institutional has said it plans to work with groups such as Ethlabs and the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance. By mid-July, it had opened recruitment for business development, marketing, and technical architecture roles. The hiring push suggests the group is trying to build capacity quickly as demand grows from financial institutions interested in Ethereum-based tools.
Both Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional have said they operate independently. They also intend to provide open-access guidance to financial institutions studying blockchain implementation.
Their emergence shows how Ethereum’s support structure is spreading beyond the foundation. It also suggests that some of the foundation’s former internal knowledge is being transferred into specialized organizations with narrower mandates.
Institutional adoption becomes a larger focus
The launch of Ethereum Institutional comes as Ethereum’s role in traditional finance becomes more visible. Spot Ethereum ETFs, tokenized assets, stablecoins, and blockchain-based settlement systems have all increased attention on the network.
For banks and asset managers, Ethereum offers a large public blockchain with deep developer activity, high liquidity, and a long record of operation. But using Ethereum in regulated financial settings requires more than technical access. Institutions need compliance guidance, risk frameworks, custody solutions, reporting systems, and clarity about how public blockchain infrastructure fits into existing financial rules.
That is where groups such as Ethereum Institutional may play a larger role. They can serve as translators between Ethereum’s technical community and traditional finance. They may also help explain Ethereum’s roadmap, network risks, staking mechanics, and settlement capabilities in language that financial institutions understand.
This growing institutional focus could affect the type of research that receives funding. If more outside capital comes from companies and financial groups, future software development may place greater emphasis on features that support faster settlement, lower costs, improved security, and better integration with regulated systems.
That does not mean Ethereum’s public goods mission disappears. But it does mean competition for attention and funding may become more visible. Technical upgrades that help large financial users may receive stronger backing than work with less obvious commercial benefit.
Staking data shows strong network participation
The organizational changes are taking place while Ethereum staking remains high. Recent data from early July showed that users had locked up about 40.4 million ETH to help secure the main chain. That represented roughly 33.45% of the total ETH supply.
A high staking rate can be viewed in several ways. It may suggest confidence in Ethereum’s long-term security model, since many holders are willing to lock ETH in validators or staking services. It also reduces the freely circulating supply of ETH, which can affect market liquidity.
At the same time, high staking participation means more of the network’s security depends on validator performance, staking infrastructure, and the distribution of staked ETH across operators. Concentration risk remains an important issue for Ethereum, especially if a small number of large staking providers or custodians control too much validation activity.
For traders, the staking level is one of several data points to watch alongside transaction fees, validator exits, ETF flows, stablecoin activity, and network upgrades. None of these indicators gives a complete view on its own, but together they help show how Ethereum is being used and how capital is moving around the network.
Public funds add another market force
The rise of spot Ethereum ETFs and other public market products has added a new layer to Ethereum’s trading environment. These funds can bring larger and more traditional pools of capital into ETH exposure, but they can also make price behavior more closely tied to public market hours and institutional portfolio adjustments.
Large public funds now hold meaningful daily influence. One leading Ethereum-focused fund has been cited in market discussions as managing roughly $6.5 billion in assets. When products of that size see strong inflows or outflows, they can affect short-term demand for ETH and shape trader expectations.
Daily fund flow data has therefore become more important. Traders who follow Ethereum now often monitor whether public funds are adding or reducing exposure, especially around the opening and closing periods of major equity markets.
This does not mean Ethereum trades only like a stock. ETH still trades around the clock across global venues, and crypto-native activity remains important. But public funds may increase the connection between ETH price movements and traditional market schedules.
The more Ethereum is packaged into regulated financial products, the more its short-term behavior may be influenced by asset allocation decisions made by large institutions. That is a meaningful change from earlier market cycles, when Ethereum price action was driven more heavily by crypto-native traders, decentralized finance activity, and retail flows.
Bank forecasts show changing expectations
Traditional financial institutions have also been reassessing Ethereum’s outlook. One major bank recently lowered its Ethereum price target from $3,175 to $2,240, according to market commentary cited in the original material. The reduction reflected a more cautious view of the network’s near-term growth and the challenges around funding, competition, and upgrade delivery.
The same commentary attributed to Lee stated that the chance of an easy fix for older funding gaps was near zero. While such forecasts are not guarantees, they show that traditional finance is closely watching how Ethereum’s internal structure changes after the foundation’s restructuring.
A key question is whether the new model can keep research and development moving at the same pace. If the Ethereum Foundation becomes smaller and more work shifts outside, funding may become less centralized but also less predictable.
Private labs, nonprofit groups, and institutional partners may provide fresh resources. However, their priorities may differ. Some may focus on public goods. Others may focus on products, compliance needs, enterprise infrastructure, or commercial adoption.
For traders, this creates both opportunity and uncertainty. A broader ecosystem of research groups could make Ethereum more resilient over time. But it could also make coordination slower if too many organizations pursue different goals without clear alignment.
AI tools enter Ethereum security testing
The Ethereum Foundation’s restructuring is not the only major operational change. Its security team has also confirmed the use of artificial intelligence agents in red-team testing of Ethereum software infrastructure.
These AI agents were used to test parts of the network’s software stack and found vulnerabilities in the peer-to-peer communication layer known as “libp2p gossipsub.” The vulnerabilities were documented as CVE-2026-34219 and have since been patched.
According to researchers, the AI agents were organized into specialized roles. Some handled reconnaissance, others searched for weaknesses, some proposed repairs, and others helped validate fixes. This design allowed the system to examine a broader range of possible attack paths than a purely manual review might cover.
The foundation said human analysts remain central to the process. AI tools can expand testing coverage, but humans are still needed to verify findings, judge severity, prevent false positives, and make final decisions about patches.
The use of AI in Ethereum security work may become more common as models improve. Automated testing tools could help identify vulnerabilities earlier, especially in complex systems where many components interact. But they also introduce new challenges, including the need to audit AI-generated recommendations and ensure that automated systems do not create misleading confidence.
For a network that secures large amounts of value, security testing is not optional. Ethereum’s open infrastructure must be continuously reviewed, especially as more financial institutions build on or connect to the network.
Development funding faces a harder test
The move away from a more centralized foundation-led model means future Ethereum upgrades may depend more on outside organizations bringing in funding and specialized talent. That is a major change in how software tools, public goods, and institutional support may be built over time.
Ethereum has always depended on a wide developer community. But the Ethereum Foundation has provided a stabilizing role by funding research and helping coordinate long-term work that may not have immediate commercial value.
If that role becomes smaller, the ecosystem will need more durable funding channels. Otherwise, important but less profitable work could struggle to find support.
This includes areas such as client diversity, security audits, developer tooling, educational resources, censorship resistance, and core protocol research. These are not always easy to monetize, but they are essential for Ethereum’s health.
The new organizations formed by former foundation contributors may help fill the gap. Ethlabs can support research tied to Ethereum’s role as a settlement network. Ethereum Institutional can support adoption among financial firms. Other groups may emerge to handle additional parts of the ecosystem.
Still, the transition will require careful coordination. Ethereum’s technical roadmap is complex, and protocol changes need broad consensus. A more fragmented support system may need stronger communication channels to avoid duplication, delays, or conflicting priorities.
Traders watch governance, funding, and fund flows
For traders, the Ethereum Foundation’s restructuring is not just an internal staffing matter. It affects the broader story around Ethereum’s long-term development, institutional adoption, and market behavior.
Daily fund flows into public Ethereum products are likely to remain an important signal. So are staking levels, validator exits, transaction fees, layer-2 activity, and updates from major research groups.
Traders may also pay closer attention to announcements from banks, asset managers, and newly formed Ethereum-focused organizations. If future upgrades become more closely tied to institutional needs, public communications from these groups could carry greater weight.
At the same time, sudden regulatory changes remain a major risk. As Ethereum becomes more integrated with traditional finance, decisions by regulators in the United States, Europe, Asia, and other regions may have faster and broader market effects.
The shift toward private and nonprofit research groups also means the market may respond more sharply to signs of funding strength or weakness. If new organizations secure strong backing and deliver useful work, confidence in Ethereum’s development model may improve. If coordination problems emerge, traders may become more cautious.
The Ethereum Foundation’s restructuring closes one chapter in the network’s history. What comes next is a more distributed system of support, with independent organizations taking on larger roles in research, security, and institutional engagement.
That model may fit Ethereum’s decentralized identity. But it also raises the stakes for coordination, funding, and execution. Ethereum’s future will now depend less on one central foundation and more on whether a wider group of organizations can keep the network moving forward while preserving the public, open structure that made it important in the first place.
Explore how Ethereum works under the hood and its evolving ecosystem in our guide: learn about Ethereum today.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
