Global venture funding for cryptocurrency companies reached $13.3 billion in the first half of 2026, equaling the full-year total recorded in 2024, even as the number of transactions fell sharply. The data point to a market that is no longer spreading capital broadly across early-stage ideas, but concentrating it in fewer, larger deals tied to companies with revenue, licenses, banking relationships and existing market share.
The number of crypto funding transactions dropped 78% to 435 in the first six months of 2026, according to data compiled by Tiger Research and RootData from 9,416 transactions tracked since 2018. Traditional financial institutions took part in 54.5% of all deals, underlining how banks, payment firms, asset managers and regulated financial groups have become central participants in digital-asset financing.
The shift marks a clear break from the earlier crypto cycle, when capital often flowed into early-stage protocols, gaming projects, NFTs, social applications and experimental infrastructure. In 2026, money is moving toward later-stage companies, mergers and acquisitions, stablecoin infrastructure, custody services, centralized trading platforms and prediction markets.
Market funding is still large, but it is now more selective. The headline dollar amount suggests resilience, but the collapse in deal count shows that many smaller projects are being left without fresh financing. The result is a narrower market where scale, regulation and distribution are increasingly more important than novelty.
Fewer deals, much larger checks
Seed-stage activity has declined dramatically. In the first half of 2026, seed-stage crypto transactions totaled 81, down 88% from 694 in 2022. Seed rounds accounted for 18.7% of all deals, compared with 35.3% four years earlier.
Later-stage rounds now dominate the funding landscape. They accounted for 75.2% of total capital raised in the first half of 2026, showing that backers are giving priority to businesses that have already moved beyond the concept phase.
Series A financing reached $745 million, surpassing the $423 million raised through seed-stage deals. That reversal is important because it shows that venture capital is no longer primarily focused on discovering the next wave of early crypto applications. Instead, it is backing companies that have already demonstrated product-market fit, revenue potential or strategic value.
Average deal sizes have also widened sharply by stage. Seed rounds averaged $5.4 million, while Series A rounds averaged $22.4 million. Series C rounds averaged $127 million, and Series E rounds averaged $202 million.
Large transactions have become much more common. Thirty-two deals exceeded $100 million in the first half of 2026. Such transactions made up 7.4% of all deals, compared with just 1.1% in 2024. The average deal size across the crypto sector rose to $47.4 million, roughly four times the earlier level.
That change helps explain how total funding could reach $13.3 billion while the number of transactions fell so steeply. Capital is not disappearing from crypto. It is being concentrated.
Traditional finance takes a bigger role
The growing role of traditional finance is one of the clearest trends in the data. Participation from banks and other financial institutions rose from 29.2% of deals in 2018 to more than 50% after 2021. By mid-2026, that share stood at 54.5%.
This means the majority of tracked crypto funding activity now includes at least one traditional financial participant. Banks, payment networks, asset managers and other regulated institutions are no longer watching from the sidelines. They are taking direct positions in the infrastructure of digital assets.
The $355 million round for Canton Network illustrates the pattern. The financing included a16z alongside HSBC and BNP Paribas, showing how venture capital firms and global banks are increasingly appearing in the same capitalization tables.
The appeal is practical. Financial institutions are focusing on areas that connect directly with existing business lines, including tokenized assets, settlement networks, custody, stablecoins, payment rails and regulated trading infrastructure. These segments are easier to evaluate than speculative consumer applications because they often generate measurable fees or fit within existing compliance frameworks.
This shift also changes the balance of power in crypto funding. Earlier cycles were often driven by crypto-native funds, retail enthusiasm and rapid token sales. The current cycle is more heavily shaped by regulated institutions, corporate acquisitions and large balance sheets.
Sector priorities have changed
Infrastructure was once the dominant category in crypto venture funding. That is no longer the case. Infrastructure’s share of capital fell from 50.9% in 2024 to 14.8% in 2026.
The drop does not necessarily mean infrastructure is unimportant. Rather, much of the basic blockchain infrastructure layer has already been built, consolidated or absorbed into larger companies. Capital providers are now favoring businesses that sit closer to revenue, transactions and compliance.
Payments and stablecoins received 25.3% of crypto funding in the first half of 2026. Centralized exchanges accounted for 18.2%, while prediction markets captured 17.5%.
The year-to-date surge in payments and stablecoin financing was especially large. Funding in that category climbed nearly twenty-fold to $2.85 billion, driven mainly by large corporate transactions. The most notable was Mastercard’s $1.8 billion purchase of BVNK, a stablecoin payments company.
That deal reflects a broader race among financial firms to control the rails for digital money movement. Stablecoins have moved from a crypto trading tool into a central piece of payment strategy for banks, card networks, fintech companies and cross-border transfer businesses.
The stablecoin market has grown alongside that interest. Public market data show that the total value of fiat-pegged tokens is near $306 billion, with two large issuers controlling most of global supply. The concentration highlights both the scale of demand for dollar-linked blockchain assets and the limited number of platforms trusted to issue them at scale.
Gaming, NFTs and social crypto lose momentum
The hardest-hit sectors are the ones most closely associated with the speculative boom of earlier cycles. Gaming, NFTs and social applications have seen funding collapse.
Gaming deals fell 96% to just five in the first half of 2026. Funding for crypto gaming dropped from $758.6 million to $44.8 million. NFT funding fell to $14.7 million, while social and entertainment applications attracted $70.1 million.
These figures show how sharply capital has moved away from consumer-facing crypto experiments that rely on volatile token incentives or uncertain user retention. During the previous cycle, gaming and NFT projects raised large sums on the expectation that digital ownership would transform online communities, entertainment and virtual economies.
In practice, many of those projects struggled to maintain active users after token prices declined. Others failed to produce durable revenue outside of speculative trading. As a result, backers have become more cautious.
The pullback does not mean these sectors have disappeared, but it does show that they are no longer at the center of crypto financing. New projects in these areas now face a much higher bar. They must show genuine user demand, sustainable economics and a reason to use blockchain technology beyond marketing.
DeFi funding falls, but larger players remain
Decentralized finance also saw fewer transactions, but the decline in capital was less severe. DeFi deal count dropped 71%, while total funding fell 34%. The average DeFi deal rose to $10.4 million.
That pattern suggests that capital is still available for DeFi, but mainly for established platforms with visible usage and revenue. Smaller protocols are finding it harder to raise money, while larger names continue to attract sizeable rounds.
Morpho accounted for a major share of the category after raising $175 million. That single round represented 17.7% of all DeFi financing in the period.
The contrast between falling transaction counts and larger average rounds reflects the broader market structure. Funding is moving toward DeFi platforms that have already survived several market cycles, built recognizable brands and demonstrated real lending, borrowing or trading activity.
At the same time, newer DeFi teams face more difficulty. The sector has matured, and the market is less willing to finance projects based only on high yields, token incentives or small technical differences.
Custody gains from institutional demand
Custody services have become one of the clearest beneficiaries of the shift toward regulated digital-asset finance. Funding for custody expanded fifteen-fold to $317 million.
The rise is tied to demand from asset managers, banks, funds and companies that need secure ways to hold digital assets while meeting regulatory, audit and operational requirements. As more traditional financial firms use crypto-linked products, custody becomes a core service rather than a back-office detail.
Anchorage accounted for roughly one-third of total custody funding after raising $100 million. The round shows how regulated custody providers are being treated as critical infrastructure for the next phase of the market.
Custody also benefits from the growth of spot crypto exchange-traded funds, tokenized assets and stablecoin settlement. These products require reliable safekeeping, reporting and compliance controls. That makes custody less cyclical than many consumer-facing crypto categories.
Centralized exchanges drive acquisition activity
Centralized exchange-related funding rose to 18.2% of total crypto funding. Much of that activity came through mergers and acquisitions rather than early-stage financing.
Since 2024, acquisitions have represented 75.5% of the centralized exchange category. Major transactions included Coinbase’s $2.9 billion purchase of Deribit, Kraken’s $1.5 billion acquisition of NinjaTrader and the $2 billion stake taken by Abu Dhabi’s MGX fund in Binance.
These deals show that large platforms are using acquisitions to expand product lines, enter regulated markets and capture new trading activity. Derivatives, futures, options and traditional brokerage connections are becoming key targets.
The acquisition pattern also shows that consolidation is accelerating. Instead of funding many new exchanges, capital is flowing toward existing platforms with liquidity, licenses, customers and operational infrastructure.
For traders, this could mean fewer independent venues over time, but deeper liquidity on the largest platforms. For companies, it raises the cost of competing without scale.
Prediction markets emerge as a major category
Prediction markets have also become a major funding theme after gaining regulatory momentum in 2025. Authorization from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission helped bring the sector closer to mainstream financial activity.
Kalshi passed $100 billion in volume and secured two $1 billion funding rounds from major backers. Polymarket received $1.6 billion in total from ICE.
The funding surge reflects growing interest in markets that allow participants to trade on the outcome of political events, economic data, sports, policy decisions and other real-world questions. The category sits at the intersection of trading, information markets and regulated derivatives.
Still, prediction markets remain politically and legally sensitive. Their growth depends on continued regulatory clarity and public confidence that these platforms can avoid manipulation, protect users and comply with market rules.
ETFs reshape market behavior
Public fund-flow data also show that spot Bitcoin ETFs in the United States have become a central force in digital-asset markets. By the middle of July 2026, U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin funds had absorbed more than $51 billion in net new cash and held about $77.7 billion in total assets.
The largest spot Bitcoin trust run by a major global asset manager held roughly $54 billion on its own. That level of concentration shows how much of Bitcoin’s market access has shifted into traditional brokerage and asset-management channels.
The rise of ETFs is changing how traders interact with crypto. Rather than buying Bitcoin directly through wallets or crypto-native platforms, many market participants are gaining exposure through regulated funds that trade during standard market hours.
That structure links part of Bitcoin’s price behavior more closely to traditional equity-market sessions, fund flows and Wall Street product demand. It also strengthens the role of large asset managers in shaping liquidity.
For smaller digital assets, the contrast is becoming more severe. Major assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum are more likely to attract ETF demand, custody support and institutional trading infrastructure. Secondary tokens without clear revenue, strong usage or regulatory clarity may face a tougher environment for liquidity and financing.
A market defined by consolidation
Taken together, the data show a crypto funding market that is maturing, but also narrowing. Capital remains available, yet it is being directed toward fewer companies, larger rounds, regulated business models and acquisition targets.
The market has moved away from broad early-stage experimentation. It is now centered on payments, stablecoins, custody, trading platforms, prediction markets and financial infrastructure that can connect with the existing banking system.
This does not mean innovation has ended. It means the terms have changed. Crypto companies now need more than a white paper, a token and a fast-growing online community. They need revenue, compliance, distribution and strategic relevance.
The first half of 2026 shows that digital-asset finance is being pulled deeper into the traditional financial system. Banks, payment networks, asset managers and large trading platforms are shaping where money goes. In that environment, the winners are increasingly the companies that can operate at scale, meet regulatory standards and serve real financial demand.
As institutional capital reshapes crypto, explore how crypto infrastructure is evolving in 2026 and what it means for long‑term investors.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
