Bitcoin retreated to around $63,000 on Tuesday after briefly touching its highest level in two weeks, as weakness in U.S. technology shares and a sharp selloff in semiconductor stocks weighed on risk assets.
The world’s largest cryptocurrency rose as high as $64,660 earlier in the session, its strongest level since June 22, before losing momentum as major U.S. equity benchmarks turned lower. The S&P 500 fell about 0.6%, while the Nasdaq 100 dropped roughly 2.1%, reflecting heavier pressure on growth and technology names.
The pullback underscored Bitcoin’s renewed sensitivity to broader risk sentiment. After spending parts of recent weeks trading with a weaker or even negative relationship to technology stocks, Bitcoin’s short-term correlation with the Nasdaq has moved sharply higher. Independent trader Daan Crypto Trades said the correlation had climbed to +0.72 from -0.87 over the past week, a rapid shift that suggests Bitcoin is once again moving more closely with high-growth equities.
That change came as traders watched a difficult session for chipmakers. Micron Technology fell more than 9%, leading declines across parts of the semiconductor sector after recent earnings-related volatility and renewed concern about stretched valuations in artificial intelligence-linked shares. Other chip-related names also came under pressure, adding to a broader risk-off tone across technology markets.
The weakness left Bitcoin caught between improving crypto-specific demand and a less supportive macro backdrop. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a second consecutive day of inflows, showing continued demand through regulated fund products. Still, that support was not enough to push Bitcoin decisively through the mid-$60,000 area, where traders have been watching for confirmation of a stronger rebound.
Stocks set the tone
Bitcoin’s Tuesday retreat was less about a sudden change in crypto fundamentals and more about the mood across risk assets. When the Nasdaq 100 sells off sharply, Bitcoin often struggles to hold gains, particularly during periods when traders are treating it as a high-beta asset rather than a defensive store of value.
The pressure in semiconductor shares was especially important because chipmakers have been among the leading drivers of U.S. equity gains. The sector has benefited from strong demand tied to artificial intelligence infrastructure, cloud computing, data centers and advanced computing hardware. But that strong run has also made the group vulnerable to profit-taking whenever earnings expectations, guidance or valuation concerns shift.
Micron’s drop of more than 9% stood out because memory-chip demand is often viewed as a useful signal for the broader technology cycle. Weakness in names tied to chips, servers and AI infrastructure can quickly affect sentiment across the Nasdaq, and that sentiment can spill into Bitcoin when correlations rise.
Futures markets had already suggested a more cautious open for technology shares, and that tone carried into the session. Traders also monitored adjustments across major equity indexes, which can trigger portfolio rebalancing and short-term volatility as funds that track those indexes buy and sell shares to match new weightings.
Some market chatter focused on unusually fast index changes involving high-growth companies. However, claims around SpaceX being added to the Nasdaq 100 should be treated carefully because SpaceX remains privately held and is not a publicly traded Nasdaq 100 constituent. The broader market point remains that changes in index composition, heavy trading in growth shares and sharp moves in technology leaders can all affect liquidity conditions for risk assets, including Bitcoin.
Bitcoin’s link to Nasdaq returns
The most important development for Bitcoin may be the speed at which its relationship with the Nasdaq has changed.
A move in correlation from deeply negative to strongly positive in a short period does not guarantee that Bitcoin will keep tracking technology stocks. Correlations can change quickly, especially over short time frames. But the latest shift matters because it shows that traders are again pricing Bitcoin in line with the same risk forces shaping U.S. equities.
When Bitcoin trades with a high positive correlation to the Nasdaq, it tends to benefit when technology shares rise and struggle when they fall. That makes the cryptocurrency more exposed to equity-market corrections, interest-rate expectations, earnings trends and risk appetite. In that environment, Bitcoin may behave less like an independent asset and more like a volatile growth trade.
This relationship has appeared several times in recent years. During periods of easy financial conditions and strong liquidity, Bitcoin often rises alongside technology shares. During periods of tighter policy, slowing growth expectations or reduced appetite for risk, Bitcoin can fall with the Nasdaq.
The current setup is especially notable because traders had recently been watching for signs that Bitcoin might decouple from equities. Spot ETF demand, longer-term supply dynamics and the post-halving environment had all been cited as possible reasons for Bitcoin to trade on its own drivers. Tuesday’s action showed that, at least in the near term, broader market pressure can still dominate.
ETF inflows offer support, but not control
Flows into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs provided one of the more constructive signals for the market. The funds recorded another day of net inflows, extending a short run of positive demand after a period of uneven activity.
Public ETF flow trackers showed a notable net inflow on Monday, with figures around $265.7 million cited by market watchers. That was described as the strongest single-day intake since early May. A second consecutive day of inflows suggested that some traders were still willing to add exposure through regulated products even as Bitcoin struggled to break higher.
ETF flows matter because they represent a visible channel of demand. When spot Bitcoin ETFs take in money, fund providers generally need to acquire Bitcoin or adjust holdings to match that demand. Strong and sustained inflows can tighten available supply and support prices over time.
But the reaction on Tuesday showed that ETF demand alone may not be enough to overcome weakness in broader markets. Bitcoin’s failure to hold the move above $64,000 indicated that traders were still cautious near resistance. The inflows may have helped limit the decline, but they did not create the kind of momentum needed for a clean breakout.
That distinction is important. Positive ETF flows are supportive, but they are not the only force driving price. Liquidity conditions, equity-market volatility, the U.S. dollar, Treasury yields and sentiment toward speculative assets can all influence Bitcoin’s direction. When several of those forces turn less favorable at the same time, ETF inflows may slow the decline rather than reverse it.
Chart signals split the market
Traders are also divided by conflicting signals on Bitcoin’s price chart.
On shorter time frames, some traders have pointed to a possible “rounding top” pattern. This formation can appear when buying pressure fades gradually after a rally. Instead of reversing sharply, price begins to flatten, then rolls over as sellers gain control. If confirmed, a rounding top can signal that a short-term uptrend is weakening and that a deeper pullback may follow.
At the same time, veteran technical analyst John Bollinger said Bitcoin had reached a “critical point” as a possible “W” pattern developed on the daily chart. A “W” pattern, also known as a double bottom, forms when price tests a low area twice and fails to break materially lower. If buyers then push the price above the middle peak between the two lows, the pattern can suggest that downward momentum is fading.
The tension between these two formations explains why Bitcoin’s current range is being watched so closely. A rounding top would point to exhaustion near resistance. A confirmed “W” pattern would point to a potential reversal after months of choppy, compressed trading.
For the bullish case, the key area is around the mid-$60,000 level, particularly near $65,000. A sustained move above that zone would strengthen the view that buyers are regaining control. It would also suggest that the recent two-week high was not just a temporary spike.
For the bearish case, traders are watching whether Bitcoin can hold recent support. A failure to defend the latest lows would weaken the proposed “W” structure and increase the risk of another move lower. In that scenario, traders would likely look to broader equity conditions for clues on where the next floor may form.
Bollinger’s focus on the pattern is notable because he is best known for creating Bollinger Bands, a technical tool used to evaluate volatility and price extremes. His comment that Bitcoin is at a critical point reflects the importance of the next move rather than a guarantee of direction.
Why the S&P 500 matters
Some traders are looking beyond Bitcoin’s own chart and focusing on the S&P 500. The reason is simple: if Bitcoin is moving more closely with equities, then the next correction in major stock indexes could help define Bitcoin’s near-term bottom.
Several past cycles support that view. In 2015, 2018 and 2022, Bitcoin’s major lows developed during or after broader periods of pressure across risk assets. Those cycles were not identical, but they shared a common feature: Bitcoin struggled when liquidity tightened and risk appetite faded, then recovered when conditions stabilized.
The S&P 500’s recent path has drawn comparisons with earlier episodes of declining risk tolerance. If the index continues to weaken, Bitcoin may find it difficult to stage a sustained rally, even with ETF inflows improving. If the equity pullback proves shallow and buyers return quickly to technology shares, Bitcoin could regain momentum and test resistance again.
The semiconductor sector remains one of the key areas to watch. Because chip stocks have become central to the artificial intelligence trade, sharp moves in that group can affect the entire Nasdaq. As long as chipmakers remain under pressure, Bitcoin may face a tougher environment.
At the same time, Bitcoin’s downside may be cushioned if spot ETF demand continues and long-term holders remain steady. That creates a market in which dips can attract buyers, but rallies may still be capped by macro pressure.
Key levels ahead
Bitcoin’s immediate range is becoming clearer. The first major resistance area sits around $64,500 to $65,000, near Tuesday’s high and the middle peak of the potential “W” pattern. A convincing break above that zone would likely attract fresh momentum traders and reduce concern about the rounding-top formation.
Above that, traders would look for a move toward the upper-$60,000 area, where previous supply could reappear. A push through that region would be needed to shift the broader tone more decisively bullish.
On the downside, the low-$60,000 region is the first area to monitor. A break below that zone could bring renewed attention to support closer to the high-$50,000 area, especially if U.S. equities continue to slide.
For now, Bitcoin remains in a sensitive position. ETF inflows are improving, but price action is not yet strong enough to confirm a breakout. Technical signals are mixed, and the cryptocurrency’s renewed correlation with the Nasdaq means that moves in technology shares may remain the dominant short-term driver.
The next few sessions could determine whether Tuesday’s two-week high was the start of a broader recovery or another failed attempt to reclaim higher ground. For traders, the key question is whether Bitcoin can separate from weakness in equities or whether the selloff in technology shares will continue to pull it back into range-bound trading.
For deeper insight into BTC’s market drivers, explore our latest analysis in this article today.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
