Bitcoin’s sharp fall from its record high of about $126,000 in October 2025 to roughly $57,800 in July 2026 has left the market divided over where the cryptocurrency may finally stabilize, with major financial firms and independent researchers now focusing on two broad downside zones.
The first and more widely discussed range sits between $50,000 and $60,000, where several models place Bitcoin’s current cost basis, realized price, or first major support area. The second, more bearish range sits closer to $40,000 to $46,000, where analysts say the market could move if liquidity weakens further, spot ETF demand remains soft, or macroeconomic stress deepens.
No clear consensus has emerged around a single bottom. Some forecasts suggest Bitcoin has already moved close to a cyclical floor, while others argue that the decline from the October peak may not yet have fully cleared excess leverage, weak hands, or fading speculative demand.
The debate has intensified because the latest rebound from $57,800 has not yet been supported by the kind of sustained capital inflows that typically accompany a durable trend reversal. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net additions of $75.7 million during the week ending July 17, a positive but modest figure compared with the scale of outflows and volatility seen during the broader drawdown.
Market participants are now watching whether those inflows can continue for several weeks. Without stronger demand, analysts say Bitcoin may remain vulnerable to another test of lower support levels.
Forecasts cluster near $50,000 but lower scenarios remain in play
Standard Chartered has remained among the more constructive major banks. The bank previously estimated that Bitcoin may have already reached its cyclical low near $59,000 and maintained a year-end target of $100,000. Bitcoin later slipped below that level to about $57,800, bringing the bank’s floor estimate close to the short-term low but also raising questions about whether the market had fully stabilized.
A separate forecast from 10x Research placed the potential bottom closer to $50,000. Markus Thielen, the firm’s head of research, revised his earlier estimate downward after previously pointing to a level near $55,000. Using Elliott Wave modeling, he identified a possible support zone between $46,628 and $50,732. The adjustment reflected concerns about a stronger U.S. dollar and tighter liquidity conditions, both of which can reduce appetite for risk assets such as Bitcoin.
CryptoQuant data placed Bitcoin’s realized price, which measures the average acquisition cost of coins on-chain, near $53,600. That metric has often functioned as a key valuation boundary during past bear markets. Julio Moreno’s report for the data provider cited weak demand as a major issue and said a lasting floor would likely require stronger spot market activity, renewed ETF inflows, and healthier stablecoin liquidity.
Citi also reduced its 12-month Bitcoin target, cutting its estimate from $112,000 to $82,000. The bank described a downside scenario in which a recession and further spot ETF outflows could push Bitcoin toward $53,000. Citi framed that level as a stress scenario rather than its central forecast, but the figure added to the growing focus on the low-$50,000 area as a possible support band.
NYDIG identified $53,700 as another key reference point because it approximated the network-wide average entry cost at the time of its analysis. The firm also examined a much deeper decline as a hypothetical pressure test. A 70% drop from Bitcoin’s historical high would imply a price near $37,900. NYDIG did not present that level as its base case, but it showed how much downside could remain in an extreme bear-market scenario.
Galaxy research sees a wider risk range
Galaxy Research offered one of the broader frameworks among large digital asset firms, using 13 indicators to assess whether Bitcoin had reached a market low. According to its framework, only four indicators had fully triggered, suggesting that the market’s correction may still be incomplete.
Galaxy placed its base case for a more durable trough between $40,000 and $46,000. That range is lower than the levels highlighted by several banks and on-chain models, and it reflects the possibility that the market may need more time to reset if macroeconomic pressure remains elevated.
The difference between the $50,000-to-$55,000 camp and the $40,000-to-$46,000 camp has become one of the central questions for Bitcoin traders. The higher range is tied closely to realized cost, ETF flow expectations, and current support behavior. The lower range is tied more to historical drawdowns, late-cycle corrections, and the risk that liquidity conditions may deteriorate again.
Technical research from 22V Research also identified $60,000 as the first major level to watch. Analyst John Roque said a break below that threshold could open a path toward $40,000. That view was structured as a contingency rather than a firm prediction, but it reinforced the importance of the $60,000 area as a dividing line between stabilization and renewed downside risk.
Other research groups have outlined still-lower levels if the downturn extends. Zacks suggested Bitcoin could move toward $40,000 if the decline lasts beyond one year. Stifel pointed to a possible move near $38,000, while Ned Davis Research estimated that Bitcoin could fall toward $31,000 in the event of a full “crypto winter.”
Those projections remain more bearish than the main institutional cluster, but they show how quickly expectations widen when analysts model a prolonged period of weak demand, tighter financial conditions, and reduced risk-taking.
ETF flows remain central to the recovery case
The spot ETF market has become one of the most important gauges of Bitcoin demand. After the steep decline from the October peak, traders are looking for evidence that large asset managers, funds, and long-term buyers are returning.
The $75.7 million in net additions during the week ending July 17 marked a step in the right direction, but analysts said the amount was too small to confirm a durable reversal. A single week of positive inflows is not usually enough to rebuild confidence after a drawdown of more than 50%.
Massabni, who has been tracking flows and sentiment, said the market still lacks a heavy catalyst. In his view, capital flows need to become larger and remain positive for several consecutive weeks before they can support a convincing price reversal. That view is broadly consistent with the cautious tone across much of the market: Bitcoin has stopped falling sharply for now, but the evidence of a sustained recovery remains incomplete.
ETF demand matters because it can absorb available supply and signal renewed interest from larger pools of capital. During bull phases, steady ETF accumulation can reduce pressure from short-term sellers and miners. During weak phases, outflows can amplify declines by forcing selling or discouraging new allocation.
For now, the ETF data point to hesitation rather than panic. The market is not seeing the same aggressive accumulation that supported earlier advances, but it is also not seeing the extreme outflows that would clearly confirm a deeper breakdown.
Mining data point to stress in the network economy
Bitcoin’s network metrics also show the effects of the price decline. The total computing power securing the network fell to a weekly average of 880.32 exahashes per second on July 11. That decline suggests that some mining companies have powered down older or less efficient machines as lower Bitcoin prices and high electricity costs compressed margins.
Hashrate declines are not unusual during difficult market periods. When revenue falls, miners with higher operating costs often reduce activity to preserve cash. Older equipment becomes harder to justify, especially in regions where power prices are elevated or access to financing has tightened.
A drop in computing power does not necessarily mean the network is in danger. Bitcoin’s difficulty adjustment is designed to respond to hashrate changes over time. Still, weaker mining activity can reveal stress in one of the market’s core business segments. It can also affect selling behavior, because miners under pressure may liquidate part of their holdings to cover costs.
Historically, miner capitulation has sometimes appeared near market lows, but it is not a precise timing tool. It can occur before a final bottom, during a base-building phase, or after a major low has already formed. For that reason, mining data are being watched alongside ETF flows, realized price, stablecoin liquidity, and broader macro conditions.
Corporate treasuries remain under scrutiny
Corporate Bitcoin holders remain another important part of the market narrative. Strategy and Metaplanet continue to draw attention because their balance-sheet decisions are often viewed as indicators of institutional confidence in Bitcoin.
Strategy sold 3,588 BTC between June 29 and July 5 for roughly $216 million, while still holding 843,775 BTC overall. The company also increased its cash reserves to $3 billion. The sale was small relative to its total holdings, but it was closely watched because Strategy has long been one of the most prominent corporate buyers of Bitcoin.
The move may be interpreted less as an abandonment of Bitcoin and more as a liquidity management decision during volatile market conditions. Still, any sale by a major holder can affect sentiment, especially when prices are already under pressure.
Metaplanet has continued to publicly maintain ambitious Bitcoin accumulation goals. The company has said it aims to hold 100,000 BTC by the end of 2026 and 210,000 BTC by 2027. Its targets remain among the most aggressive corporate treasury plans in the market.
Corporate treasury behavior matters because it can influence perceptions of long-term demand. If major corporate holders continue to accumulate or maintain their targets, traders may view that as a sign of confidence. If more companies shift toward cash preservation, the market could see that as evidence of caution.
Independent researchers remain divided
Independent analysts remain split on how low Bitcoin could fall before forming a durable base. Michael Terpin has suggested that a floor could form near $57,000, close to the recent low. Willy Woo’s on-chain models point to a broader range between $46,000 and $54,000, while Jiang has projected a possible range of $42,000 to $44,000 later in 2026 based on cyclical patterns.
Some market commentators have discussed even deeper retracements toward $35,000 or below, though those views generally depend on a more severe continuation of the downturn. Such scenarios would likely require a combination of ETF outflows, macroeconomic weakness, falling liquidity, and a broader retreat from speculative assets.
The wide spread of forecasts reflects the unusual structure of the current market. Bitcoin is no longer driven only by retail enthusiasm, miner cycles, and crypto-native liquidity. Spot ETFs, corporate treasuries, macro funds, central bank expectations, and competition from other high-growth sectors now all play larger roles.
That broader structure can make support levels harder to identify. A key on-chain level may matter less if ETFs continue to lose assets. A technical support zone may fail if the dollar strengthens sharply. A corporate accumulation plan may help sentiment, but it may not be enough to offset a broad risk-off move across global markets.
Macro policy and AI rotation add to uncertainty
Monetary policy remains one of the biggest variables for Bitcoin. Traders are waiting for central banks to announce their August interest-rate decisions and updated guidance. Lower rates or a clearer path toward easing could help risk assets by improving liquidity expectations. Higher-for-longer policy signals could keep pressure on Bitcoin and other speculative markets.
The U.S. dollar is also being watched closely. A stronger dollar often tightens global financial conditions and can weigh on assets that rely on abundant liquidity. That was one reason some forecasts were revised lower after the earlier decline.
Another factor is asset rotation into AI-related equities and infrastructure plays. Over the past year, parts of the technology market linked to artificial intelligence have attracted significant capital. If that rotation continues, Bitcoin may face competition for speculative and growth-oriented capital, particularly from traders seeking exposure to high-momentum themes.
Stablecoin liquidity is another key signal. A healthier stablecoin market can indicate that capital is available to move into crypto assets quickly. Weak stablecoin growth, by contrast, may suggest that traders are not yet preparing to take on more exposure.
Market is still searching for confirmation
Across the major forecasts, the clearest conclusion is that Bitcoin has not yet produced a unified bottom signal. The $50,000-to-$55,000 range remains important because it aligns with several cost-basis and stress-case models. The $40,000-to-$46,000 range remains important because some broader market frameworks suggest the correction may need to run further before fully resetting.
The recent rebound from $57,800 has eased immediate pressure, but it has not settled the larger debate. A durable bottom would likely require stronger spot ETF inflows, improved spot market demand, more stable mining conditions, and clearer macro support.
Until those signals improve, Bitcoin may continue moving within a wide and volatile range. Traders are likely to keep focusing on the realized price area near the low-$50,000s as a key boundary, while also preparing for the possibility that a deeper washout could test the mid-$40,000s or lower.
For now, the market’s message is cautious rather than conclusive. Bitcoin has fallen far enough to make valuation models more relevant again, but not enough for all major indicators to confirm that the decline has ended.
Want deeper insight into Bitcoin’s macro drivers? Read how Fed rate cuts influence Bitcoin volatility and refine your long‑term support level strategy.
Disclaimer: The content on this page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not represent the views or financial advice of Toobit. We make no guarantees regarding the accuracy or completeness of this information and shall not be held liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from its use. Investing in digital assets involves risk; users should independently evaluate their financial situation and the risks involved. For further details, please consult our Terms of Service and Risk Disclosure.
