Not long ago, every mention of regulation, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), or blockchain bills in Washington sent ripples across trading desks.
But now, as regulatory drag kicks in and other jurisdictions sharpen their act, you have to ask: is the U.S. still the center of the crypto world?
Why the U.S. once reigned supreme
There are three pillars behind America’s crypto dominance:
-
Regulatory power: The SEC, CFTC, and Treasury have long wielded influence on what’s legal, what’s not, and how assets are classified. A ruling from the U.S. often echoes across global markets.
-
Institutional muscle: Wall Street banks, hedge funds, and legacy financial players were quick to tap into Bitcoin, Ethereum, and digital asset infrastructure. The U.S. remains home to many of the largest crypto funds and fintech bridges.
-
Market depth and liquidity: U.S. exchanges and markets still see enormous volume. When global crypto ETFs attract record inflows, much of that money flows through U.S.-dominated channels.
These structural advantages allowed the U.S. to set rules others followed, until now.
Where the U.S. is slipping, others are gaining
Regulation = Influence
The U.S. is facing a dilemma: it holds power, but inaction or mixed signals undermine it. The SEC’s role in classifying assets, its enforcement showdowns, and shifting priorities have made policy outcomes less predictable.
Meanwhile, Congress passed the GENIUS Act in 2025 to regulate stablecoins domestically. That’s a positive step, but it’s narrow in scope and reactive rather than expansive.
Other regions are pushing forward faster. The EU’s MiCA framework gives firms clarity on issuance and licensing. Crypto-friendly jurisdictions like UAE, Switzerland, and Singapore are offering clear regulatory lanes, tax incentives, and supportive infrastructure.
When regulatory clarity moves faster elsewhere, leadership shifts.
Capital is global
Money doesn’t wait on Congress. As international investors seek yield and optionality, capital is flowing into regions where compliance is clearer. Crypto exchanges expanding outside the U.S., and fund managers setting up shop globally, hint at a possible redistribution of influence.
Policy drag and uncertainty
Every time Washington stalls (budget fights, shutdowns, regulatory gridlock), the uncertainty cascades into the crypto world. U.S.-centric projects pause, listings get delayed, and institutions reconsider exposure. That opens cracks for foreign exchanges and protocols to grab mindshare.
What this means for crypto globally
Decentralized leverage means projects, exchanges, and capital are now freer than ever to move where regulations are most favorable. The U.S. may still play a major role, but it no longer holds exclusive influence.
Meanwhile, competitive zones are emerging and positioning themselves as new co-capitals of crypto finance, attracting users and firms alike.
That said, U.S. influence still carries weight. A policy change, an SEC ruling, or a new crypto bill can still send ripples through global markets, though the reactions are becoming less uniform.
What’s taking shape is a new, multi-centered world, one where crypto power is shared across several hubs, each defined by its unique strengths and regulatory edge.
Final thought
The U.S. no longer monopolizes crypto’s center stage but it’s far from irrelevant. Its regulatory capacity, financial power, and institutional legacy continue to matter. Yet as other regions sharpen their edge, the future may be polycentric: crypto capitals in more places, not just D.C.
In 2025, being the “center” isn’t a position you hold by default. You have to earn it every day.

